My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A - Housing Standards
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-08/11/04WS
>
Item A - Housing Standards
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:57:05 PM
Creation date
8/9/2004 11:34:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/11/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT B <br /> <br />MEMO <br /> <br />To: Richie Weinman <br />From: John VanLandingham, chair, Housing Policy Board <br />Date: July 13, 2004 <br /> <br />Subject: Housing Policy Board Position Regarding Housing Code Enforcement <br /> <br />At its June 28, 2004, meeting the Housing Policy Board voted four to two against <br />recommending that the Eugene City Council adopt and enforce a housing code. Before <br />voting, the HPB had a thorough briefing by Marsha Miller, Building and Permit Services <br />manager for the City's Planning and Development Department, including a review of <br />Corvallis' experience with this issue, and a discussion. <br /> <br />The four HPB members who voted against housing code enforcement were vice-chair <br />Norton Cabell, Lane County Commissioner Bobby Green, Patricia Hadley, and Bob <br />Doppelt. Voting in favor were me and Roxie Cuellar. Gary Pape abstained, since the <br />issue will come before him as a Councilor. Several of the "no" voters indicated that it <br />was a close question. <br /> <br />Here are the reasons given by those who opposed housing code enforcement, <br />recognizing that not all the no voters agreed with all of these arguments: <br /> <br /> 1. Housing code enforcement would not promote additional affordable housing, <br />which is the HPB's mission. <br /> 2. Housing code enforcement would be of little benefit to most tenants. <br /> 3. A per-unit tax or fee on landlords would be better used for affordable housing <br />development or homelessness prevention, as recently recommended by the Homelessness <br />Prevention Task Force, instead of funding a housing code enforcement program. Using <br />the landlord tax for housing code enforcement would make it politically difficult to later <br />increase it for homelessness or affordable housing development. <br /> 4. Housing code enforcement would cost more than the benefits warrant. <br /> 5. A better solution would be to fix the state landlord-tenant law to make it work <br />better at achieving repairs. <br /> 6. Housing code enforcement would create an unneeded bureaucracy. Maybe <br />neighborhood groups could handle enforcement. <br /> 7. Don't do enforcement; instead do education. <br /> 8. Housing code enforcement is likely to lead to rent increases. Maybe impose the <br />per-unit tax on the tenants, not the landlords. <br /> 9. It would be unfair to tax all landlords for the failures of a few bad landlords. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.