Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kinnison emphasized that the situation in the areas around the University was not unique to Eugene <br />and was similar to the experiences of other university communities in the United States. He said that a <br />strong commitment from all stakeholders was required to address the problems that existed in the <br />neighborhoods and a variety of approaches were necessary. Behavioral modification could be effective <br />but was not enough, and consequences were necessary. Law enforcement had an important role in <br />addressing the issues of concern. <br /> <br />Mr. Kinnison called the council’s attention to Section 6 of the report, which included the strategies <br />developed by the working group, and noted that Appendix D was an anticipated effectiveness matrix <br />evaluation of the strategies. <br /> <br />Mr. Kinnison highlighted the strategies developed by the working group that required City support and <br />noted where council action would be required. Strategies included: <br /> <br /> <br /> Develop a Eugene “social host” ordinance <br /> <br /> Increase fines for alcohol- and noise-related offenses <br /> <br /> Enhance police resources <br /> <br /> UO Police Department/University Public Safety District <br /> <br /> Regulate party bus impacts <br /> <br /> Crime prevention through environmental design <br /> <br /> Countermeasure for traffic sign vandalism <br /> <br /> Home Ownership and Investment Program <br /> <br /> Evaluate need for Multiple-Unit Property Tax Exemption (MUPTE) in the campus area <br /> <br /> Neighborhood-based planning <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy thanked the members of the working group. She asked what constituted a neighborhood <br />association in a case such as the WUN, when it is almost entirely occupied by students. She suggested <br />the City could work with students to determine how the neighborhood could have a neighborhood <br />association that would be meaningful to its residents and in keeping with the community’s’ goals. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy endorsed approaches that increased stability in neighborhoods that now included a mix of <br />students and owner-occupants. <br /> <br />Referring to the strategy for neighborhood-based planning, Mayor Piercy endorsed code changes that <br />allowed for the inclusion of social gathering spaces in multi-unit housing. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor advocated for the development of infill compatibility standards to protect the neighborhoods <br />surrounding the campus. She believed it was important to save the South University Neighborhood and <br />expressed concern about the impact of the MUPTE on the neighborhood. She supported home ownership <br />but noted that some parents bought homes for their children while they attended the UO but the students <br />did not care about the house and treated it as a “big party place.” <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor suggested the City could save money by buying vandal-resistant signs. In response, Ms. <br />Jacobs suggested the City’s practice of placing signs in the ground without anchoring them incement <br />contributed to the problem. She reported that there were 72 missing street name signs in the South <br />University Neighborhood. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor expressed concern about increasing fines on students. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council September 14, 2011 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br />