Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Work Session: Cal Young Neighborhood Association Boundary Revision <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: October 19, 2011 Agenda Item Number: B <br />Department: Neighborhood Services Staff Contact: Michael Kinnison <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5009 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br /> <br />The current size and configuration of the Cal Young Neighborhood Association (CYNA) presents <br />significant challenges to organize, keep informed and sustain the participation of residents and property <br />owners within the boundary. Neighbors are recommending boundaries be reconfigured, resulting in <br />three associations: a smaller Cal Young Neighborhood Association and two new neighborhood <br />associations: Northeast Neighbors (NEN) and Goodpasture Island Neighbors (GIN). The City Council <br />is asked to formally recognize the new associations through adoption of their charter documents. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />In February 2000, the City Council adopted guidelines for the size and configuration of neighborhood <br />association boundaries. Key elements of the guidelines include: <br /> <br /> <br />Size – No less than 300 units and no more than eight percent of total residential addresses within <br />the City. <br /> <br /> <br />Borders – Not to be divided by major natural or manmade barrier (river, major highway, etc.); <br />not defined by a sole private sector collective (i.e. an apartment complex, homeowners <br />association or gated community); all residents in one and only one neighborhood association; not <br />necessarily aligned with precincts, school districts or census tracts. <br /> <br /> <br />Options for initiating boundary changes – (1) by membership vote of an active or semi-active <br />association; (2) as part of a strategy to reactivate a dormant association; (3) by a membership- <br />initiated petition process; (4) when the boundary of an active or semi-active association is not <br />consistent with the adopted guidelines. <br /> <br /> <br />The “if, how and when” under scenarios 2-4 will be worked out by a committee comprised of <br />representatives from the association’s board, Neighborhood Leaders Council, Neighborhood <br />Services staff and the City Councilor(s) representing the area. <br /> <br />Neighborhood Services assesses the status of all neighborhood association boundaries as part of the <br />annual neighborhood association reporting process. As part of the 2010 report, the CYNA boundary <br />was found inconsistent with configuration and size criteria. For example, the neighborhood is divided <br />by Delta Highway and Randy Papé Beltline and contains over 14 percent of the City’s residential <br />addresses (11,053). The annual review indicated that Active Bethel Citizens, Santa Clara Community <br />Organization, and Harlow Neighbors are also inconsistent with the size and/or configuration criteria of <br />the guidelines. Neighborhood Services will be coordinating a review of these neighborhood boundaries <br />in 2012. <br /> S:\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M111019\S111019B.doc <br /> <br />