My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 11/28/11 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2011 4:25:00 PM
Creation date
11/23/2011 2:48:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/28/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ATTACHMENT B <br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />McNutt Room—City Hall <br />777 Pearl Street—Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br />October 17, 2011 <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Betty Taylor, George Brown, Andrea Ortiz, George Poling, Mike Clark, <br />Chris Pryor, Alan Zelenka, Pat Farr. <br /> <br />In the absence of Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy, Council President Betty Taylor called the October 17, <br />2011, work session of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br /> <br />A. WORK SESSION: <br />Eugene Civilian Review Board 2010 Annual Report <br /> <br />The council was joined by Civilian Review Board (CRB) Chair Tim Laue and Police Auditor Mark <br />Gissiner. City Attorney Kathryn Brotherton was also present for the item. Mr. Laue provided an <br />overview of the CRB’s 20101 Annual Report. He reported that the CRB met ten times in 2010 and <br />reviewed seven allegations of misconduct and four service complaints. He described the CRB’s case <br />review process and said the board generally commented on the auditor’s adjudication recommendations. <br />Mr. Laue also described the periodic training undergone by members of the CRB to ensure they <br />understood different police policies, practices, and training approaches and briefly noted some of the <br />board’s training topics. <br /> <br />Mr. Laue said the board identified three areas of concern for 2010 that were passed along to Police Chief <br />Pete Kerns and the Eugene Police Commission for follow-up and possible policy changes: 1) <br />warrantless entries; 2) community care-taking and how it was employed in Eugene; and 3) search and <br />seizure policies. <br /> <br />Mr. Laue noted the CRB’s role in evaluating the Police Auditor and shared the seven dimensions board <br />members used to evaluate Mr. Gissiner’s performance. He said Mr. Gissiner’s review was positive. <br /> <br />Mr. Laue highlighted the CRB’s recommendations to the council, which included recommendations for <br />greater openness and transparency for open and closed cases to be accomplished by summaries of closed <br />and open cases produced by the Police Auditor; creation of a definition of “good cause” for exceptions to <br />the six-month complaint filing deadline; Police Auditor consultation with the CRB when designating <br />Community Impact Cases; and CRB authority to order the Police Chief to re-open a closed case. He <br />invited questions. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor solicited council questions and comments. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz determined from Mr. Laue that the CRB wanted to see the ambiguity between the charter <br />amendment and implementing ordinance be resolved. The charter amendment establishing the CRB gave <br />the board the authority to request a case be reopened while the implementing ordinance stated that the <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 17, 2011 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.