Laserfiche WebLink
<br />areas: 1) items that required City of Eugene council direction or ordinance changes; 2) items that should <br />be considered for Human Rights Commission work planning; and 3) items that should be given to the City <br />Manager and staff for consideration. Human Rights commissioners, committee members and staff refined <br />the recommendations. These items are the focus of this work session. They are: <br /> <br /> <br /> Updating language in Chapter 2 of Eugene Code <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The current language is about 20 years old and needs to be updated to align with current <br />o <br />human rights city efforts moving from a civil rights to human rights framing. <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioners and community members would like the council to consider updating the <br />o <br />overall introduction in Chapter 2 to reflect current human rights work and conditions. A <br />human rights orientation moves the ordinance from a civil rights only focus to an <br />inclusive, broader framework. <br /> <br /> <br /> Size of the Human Rights Commission <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Feedback from commissioners and think tank members is that the current size of the <br />o <br />commission is too large and the City of Eugene should consider reducing the size to <br />increase effectiveness. Case study research shows nationally there is an average of 9-11 <br />members for similar commissions in other communities. <br /> <br /> <br />The commission would like the council to consider reducing the commission to 10 <br />o <br />community members and one city councilor. <br /> <br /> <br /> Current commission has four standing subcommittees codified in Eugene Code <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Feedback from commissioners and community members clearly asks for the commission <br />o <br />to be nimble and to tie task team and subcommittee work to the current work plan. <br /> <br /> <br />Maintaining the current structure is neither sustainable nor effective. <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />The commission would like council to consider repealing provisions for the four <br />o <br />subcommittees. These groups would be established as needed, on a short-term basis, to <br />support adopted work plans. An accessibility committee would be created as a <br />department advisory committee to work directly with departments and City staff on the <br />broad range of accessibility challenges. <br /> <br /> <br /> Effective commission appointments <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Feedback from commissioners and community members is that more focus on the <br />o <br />recruitment and appointment process is critical to the commission’s success. <br /> <br /> <br />There is a strong desire to increase the commission’s role in supporting council in making <br />o <br />effective appointments. <br /> S:\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M111128\S1111286.doc <br />