My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Admin Order 58-10-17
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Administrative Orders
>
2010
>
Admin Order 58-10-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2012 1:16:21 PM
Creation date
12/28/2011 3:25:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Admin Orders
Document_Date
2/8/2011
Document_Number
58-10-17
CMO_Effective_Date
2/8/2011
Author
CRO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUNA Parking Zone Appeal <br />June 13, 2011 <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />G ' The proximity of public transportation to the area, <br />The City Traffic Engineer has pointed out that there are two bus routes <br />through SUNA. <br />d. The desire and/or need of residents of the area for establishment of <br />permit parking zones; <br />The desire and need of the residents in the affected portion of SUNA <br />varies but the response to the July 2010 flyer was two to one in favor of <br />the two —hour restrictions. Those in opposition have several concerns, not <br />all of which are relevant to the imposition of the residential permit parking <br />zone. For instance, several individuals testified that the cost of acquiring <br />permits for contractors were very expensive and inconvenient. However, <br />the parking permit requirement for contractors is a city—wide regulation <br />and is only $5 per day. Further, it seems like the permit issue would be <br />largely irrelevant if there were no convenient place for them to park due to <br />the presence of continuously occupied unregulated parking spots during <br />weekday work hours. <br />One individual testified in opposition because the two —hour restrictions <br />made it very difficult for employees working out of her residence to find a <br />place to park. It must be pointed out that City of Eugene zoning <br />regulations require that businesses provide on —site parking spots. <br />Several individuals testified that they might support three— or four —hour <br />parking restrictions but information provided by the Traffic Manager <br />indicated that these alternatives would result in de facto long —term parking <br />because of parking enforcement procedures. (See Finding of Fact #9, <br />above.) <br />e. The local and area —wide needs with respect to clean air, and the <br />requirements offederal and state laws and regulations; <br />The amount of vehicle emissions is closely associated with vehicle miles <br />driven. It has been recognized by the Traffic Engineer that cruising to find <br />long—term parking spots occurs in non — regulated parking areas, primarily <br />in the mornings, as University staff and students vie for the these parking <br />spots. While this parking frenzy subsides after the long—term parking spots <br />are taken, the parking spots still attract additional traffic during the day in <br />anticipation of one of the spots opening up. Once an area is posted as two — <br />hour parking, the initial parking frenzy and subsequent cruising <br />substantially dissipates, as the area is no longer suitable for University <br />staff and students. However, it has also been pointed out that the parking <br />restrictions have had the effect of pushing traffic to a different location. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.