Laserfiche WebLink
needed, the council could certainly determine that over the 20-year course of the long-term plan. He <br /> remained convinced the improvements were needed, however. <br /> <br /> Regarding the "Coburg question," Mayor Torrey opined that a joint project should be considered whether <br /> the City Council approved the plan or not. <br /> <br /> Councilor Bettman concurred with the comments of councilors Poling and Kelly and Mayor Torrey. She <br /> said the large portion of the plan sought to accommodate new growth. She alleged that SDCs were set <br /> artificially low and that ratepayers subsidized new growth. She stated that she would support the motion, <br /> though she felt this distribution of rate burden to be unfair. <br /> <br /> Councilor Bettman expressed concern that the addition of the community of Coburg into the wastewater <br /> treatment system would cost the City of Eugene ratepayers more. <br /> <br /> Councilor Pap6 commented that the concerns in Coburg regarding wastewater were not new. <br /> <br /> Councilor Pap6 referred to page 155 of the agenda item summary and asserted that the overflows did not <br /> exceed the limit set forth by the federal government. Peter Ruffler, Director of the Wastewater Division <br /> of the Public Works Department, predicted the overflows would increase. He said, looking at the <br /> historical record, there had been several continuous years of low rainfall, but prior to that there had been <br /> several instances of overflow due to storm events. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruffler stated that a comprehensive evaluation of wet weather flow management plans that had <br />looked at various options to handle peak flow issues had been conducted and the results were reflected in <br />the MWMC facilities plan and project list. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling related that, though Coburg had no SDCs in place for water, there had not been a reason <br />to have such a charge thus far. He indicated that Coburg City Manager Mike Hudson had emphasized the <br />community's willingness to "pay its way." <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner stated that the council had the material and had studied it, but the public did not have <br />such a reference. He asked staff to state for the public the amount of the rate increase. MWMC staff <br />member Susie Smith responded that the increase was projected over the course of five years to be between <br />$5.60 and $6.50 per month. Councilor Meisner reiterated that the MWMC had not done a "good enough" <br />job of making the public aware of this. <br /> <br />Gary Caldwell, staff member for MWMC, explained that the first four years of increases would get the <br />rate revenue to the debt service support level. Increases beyond that point would be for inflation and <br />operational increases. Councilor Meisner asked if there would be a decrease after six years. Mr. Caldwell <br />replied that nothing in his projections indicated there would be a decrease in the rates. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor called the rate increases unfortunate. She felt that ratepayers were shouldering the <br />expense of growth. However, she thought any sewage overflow into the river to be unacceptable. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor commented that, when and if Coburg was brought into the MWMC, measures should be <br />taken to insure that none of the added expense would be the responsibility of the Eugene ratepayers. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 28, 2004 Page 11 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />