My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A - Approval of Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-08/09/04Mtg
>
Item 2A - Approval of Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:23:10 PM
Creation date
8/9/2004 11:49:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/9/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the Willamette Greenway acquisition. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson believed that citizens were benefiting from a good deal. She felt that purchasing the <br />land outright would make the City pay more for less and would not achieve the protection of and access to <br />the natural area in the South Hills. She called the exchange a solution that would provide the City with <br />two "major assets," would meet the wishes of many citizens who had testified over the years and would <br />not discount the work of many staff people. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said in 1998, the Parks and Open Space measure called for a large park in the north end of <br />town. He believed this was the best opportunity to provide the best benefit for all of the citizens in <br />Eugene, especially the people who resided in the River Road/Santa Clara area. He said he would not <br />support the amendment in the event of a tie. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman pointed out that the amount of land to be gained in the swap was 207 acres and not 270 <br />acres as had been previously mentioned. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman reiterated her assertion that the land swap was tantamount to a special benefit to the <br />developer. She felt the McDougals were receiving such a huge benefit that they should give the City the <br />Moon Mountain property as well. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the vote on the motion was a 4:4 tie; councilors Meisner, <br /> Taylor, Bettman and Kelly voting in favor and councilors Pap6, Poling, <br /> Nathanson, and Solomon voting in opposition. Mayor Torrey cast his <br /> vote in opposition to the motion and it failed on a final vote of 5:4. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly also thanked staff for the thorough responses. He was confused by what was and was not <br />legally binding in the Metro Plan amendment or in "some other side agreement" associated with it. <br /> <br />Ms. Riner said that the public and staff oversight on the project were two-fold; through the Metro Plan <br />amendment and as a co-applicant. She said her division had the ability to review and approve the master <br />plan for the 197 acres, and not just the park. She stated that it would be evaluated in order to determine <br />that it met the purchase agreement. <br /> <br />City Attorney Glenn Klein added that, at a minimum, there would be a Metro Plan designation which <br />would come back before the City Council in addition to the amendment to the UGB. He added that the <br />City was both the land owner and the regulator in this situation. He anticipated that a detailed master site <br />plan would be developed in which all the different land uses would be delineated and would be incorpo- <br />rated into legally binding documents. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly noted the City was at the beginning of the park development process. He was uncertain <br />how he would ultimately vote on the issue. He appreciated that there would be specificity in the further <br />planning processes. He suggested that staff consider holding at least one charette style process. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner commented that he had enough qualms about the land exchange that he had supported <br />the amendment. He would, however, support the main motion as it was time to provide the northern area <br />of the City with a park. He called public input "substantial" as to what the park would include and he <br />looked forward to seeing how it would be developed. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 12, 2004 Page 11 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.