Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Poling thanked City Manager Ruiz and Chief Kerns and commended the officers of the EPD. <br />He shared Councilor Clark’s concerns about the City’s liability for the event. He believed the exemption <br />exposed the City to liability. He also shared Councilor Clark’s concern about what happened on <br />December 16. He believed it was time for the event to end. He thought the matter came down to fairness <br />and consistency in how the City treated people as it regarded enforcement of ordinances and permit <br />applications. He noted the many constituent calls he receive in opposition to the continuation of the <br />encampment. <br /> <br />Speaking to Councilor Clark’s question about what happened on December 16, City Manager Ruiz said <br />staff would return to the council prior to December 15 and the council would have made a decision by <br />that date regarding the future of Occupy Eugene. <br /> <br />Councilor Farr did not think it would take much to turn what was now a positive experience into <br />something negative given the absence of regulation. He questioned at what point the council would stop <br />extending the exemption as he saw no end. He believed the camping ban was in place for good reasons <br />and was intended not to exclude people but to ensure all were treated the same. He did not think the <br />proposed deadline was a “real date.” <br /> <br />Councilor Brown hoped that Occupy Eugene asked for future exemptions “until it gets the job done.” He <br />did not care how many months the encampment lasted. He noted that other communities had allowed <br />their Occupy movements to continue and he was willing to do the same if the encampment continued to <br />operate safely. He was prepared to continue his support indefinitely and was also prepared to consider <br />relocating the encampment to another location. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka appreciated the pragmatic nature of staff’s decision making. He did not think the EPD <br />would be able to handle the mass arrests that might be necessary if the encampment was ended. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka agreed with others who said Occupy Eugene was a very positive event and he believed <br />it was clean, safe, and well-run. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka determined from City Attorney Brotherton that the motion did not sanction the event, <br />its activities, and did not grant a permit; it merely exempted Occupy Eugene from the camping ban. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Councilor Clark about the staff response if the event spread to multiple <br />locations, City Manager Ruiz anticipated staff would return to the council for direction if that occurred. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Councilor Farr, Chief Kerns said the EPD monitored the event and if <br />officers found the atmosphere in the camp changing, they would notify the council. City Attorney <br />Brotherton noted that the resolution gave the City Manager the authority to revoke the exemption in the <br />case of an immediate public risk. <br /> <br />While he did not discount the chief’s response, Councilor Farr continued to be concerned that things <br />could become negative at the encampment very quickly, particularly as some people perceived the <br />exemption to be an open invitation to camp in Eugene at the site. He questioned whether the EPD’s best <br />efforts to respond would be adequate if things went wrong at the site. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 24, 2011 Page 10 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />