Laserfiche WebLink
a government-operated service facility may be permitted in a zone that does not allow a privately <br />operated facility offering similar services. <br /> <br />To help illustrate this point, the code allows “Mailing and Package Service” as a permitted use in <br />commercial zones, but not in residential or industrial zones. Therefore, a use such as UPS would <br />be limited to commercial zones, while a federal post office (with very similar characteristics to <br />UPS) would be permitted as a “Mailing and Package Service” in the commercial zone but also <br />permitted in a variety of other zones under the “Government Services” category. This ensures <br />appropriate mail service to the community. In the case of the potential VA facility, the code <br />contains a category called “Clinic and other Medical Health Treatment Facility.” While this broad <br />medical category allows a variety of privately- and publicly-operated medical facilities in certain <br />zones (but not I-1), the code provides additional accommodation for medical uses specifically <br />operated by a governmental agency through the inclusion of the “Government Services” category. <br />With this understanding, it would be possible for the VA facility to fit within the “Clinic and other <br />Medical Health Facility” category as well as the “Government Services” category. Staff believes <br />the Hearings Official erred in determining that a use could not fall within more than one category <br />in this way. <br /> <br />It is also worth noting that the broad accommodation of government uses is further supported in <br />Federal law by making the U.S. government exempt from local zoning regulations. On property <br />owned by the Federal government, it may site any use it wishes without regard for the uses <br />allowed by the City in the applicable zone. This in fact occurred when the new Federal <br />Courthouse was constructed on land zoned I-3, Heavy Industrial. It is clear that the Federal <br />government could site the VA facility on I-1 zoned land (or anywhere else) without the need for <br />council assistance, if they were intending to own the land rather than lease it (as proposed). It is <br />not clear that the VA facility could take advantage of the federal exemption in this case, where it <br />will not own the underlying land. <br /> <br />When considering the possible uses under “Government Services,” it is also important to <br />recognize that this category is intended to include a wide range and scale of uses. While police <br />stations, fire stations and post offices may be the most common uses that come to mind, <br />government services includes a much wider spectrum, including such uses as courthouses <br />(municipal, county, federal), the DMV, wastewater treatment facilities and city hall. Within this <br />context, it is reasonable to conclude that a VA-operated facility also fits within the government <br />services category. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />Approval of this resolution is supported by the City Council’s stated goal of supporting the <br />location of the VA outpatient clinic in Eugene. <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br /> <br />The City Council has the following options: <br />1. Adopt the attached resolution; <br />2. Modify the attached resolution and adopt, or <br />3. Decline or delay to adopt the attached resolution. <br /> <br />S:\CMO\2012 Council Agendas\M120109\S1201093E.doc <br /> <br />