Laserfiche WebLink
Schedule 6 <br /> <br />Property taxes are an operational expense to any income property. Excluding <br />property taxes, the operational expenses for an affordable housing property are <br />actually somewhat higher than for a market-rate property. In effect, it is the <br />Property Tax Exemption that allows affordable housing to offer rents that are <br />significantly below market rates. (See the attached Operating Budget from the <br />State of Oregon Apple Orchard CFC Application.) <br /> <br />The Operating Budget shows a Net Annual Income of $179,539 for year one. <br />Annual expense and debt service payments total $176,924. This leaves a Net <br />Cash Flow per year of $2,615. This assumes 31%, 41% and 51% rents ranging <br />from $226 per month to $505 per month. <br /> <br />If property tax payments of $73,635 were added to the Annual Operating <br />Expense Budget, without increasing rents, the result would be a negative Annual <br />Cash Flow of $71,020. In order to have a financially viable project, rents would <br />have to be raised, on average, by $153 per unit per month to cover the property <br />tax obligation. This would effectively make Apple Orchard a market-rate <br />apartment project. <br /> <br />The 20 year Net Present Value calculation of the property tax exemption <br />(provided in the application) shows the total value of the exemption at <br />$1,125,285. If one were to perform a like calculation on the value of the <br />additional rents that would be charged over 20 years without the exemption, the <br />benefit of the exemption to Apple Orchard residents is clearly in excess of <br />property tax exemption offered. VVhen likely market factors over the next 20 <br />years are added into the equation, it is likely that Apple Orchard rents would have <br />to rise to a level higher than market-rate. <br /> <br />The required rents do reflect the full value of the Property Tax Exemption. <br /> <br /> <br />