My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MTC - Final Report 1-22-10
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2012
>
CC Agenda - 02/11/12 Workshop
>
MTC - Final Report 1-22-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2012 10:31:42 AM
Creation date
2/10/2012 10:31:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Staff Memo
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/11/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GeneralfundedservicesinEugene,substantialtimewouldbeneeded <br />toallowforfullreviewanddiscussionbytheCityCouncilaswellasby <br />membersofthecommunity.Itwouldbereasonabletoexpectareferral <br />ofautilityfeeproposaltotheballot.Additionaltimewouldbeneeded <br />todeterminebilling,collectionandenforceprocesses.Itwouldlikely <br />takeatleasttwoyearstoimplementanewpublicserviceutilityfee. <br />Incidence&EquityAlloccupantsofdevelopedpropertywillbenefitfromcontinued <br />availabilityofthepublicservices,andallcouldbeequitablychargedthe <br />utilityfee.Publiclyownedornonprofitownedfacilitiesincluding <br />dormitoriesandgrouphousingwouldsubjecttothefee.TheCitycould <br />negotiatewhatfeelevelisappropriateratherthanapplyingastandard <br />rate,orthesefacilitiescouldbesubsidizedthroughanexemptionwhich <br />wouldshifttheirsharetootherpayers. <br />NexusThetypicalbasisforexistingpublicserviceutilityfeesinOregonisthe <br />occupancyoruseofadevelopedproperty,andthefeeistypicallylevied <br />asaflatfeeonresidentialandnonresidentialunits,oronresidential <br />unitsonly,dependingontheservicefunded.Thecostofthefunded <br />serviceisdistributedasasimpleaverageamongalloccupiedunits.This <br />basisrecognizestwokeypoints:(1)thegeneralityofthenexusbetween <br />thepublicservicefundedbythefeeandthecommonbenefitsprovided <br />bytheavailabilityandbroadusageoftheservicebyoccupantsof <br />developedpropertyacrossthecommunity,and(2)thelackofpractical <br />waystobasethefeeonactualmeasuredusageofthepublicservice. <br />Otherpossiblebasisforlevyingthefeebesidestheperunitbasis <br />includefloorareaorstreetfrontageofunits,numberoragesof <br />occupants,typeofunit,etc.Butthesewouldbearbitrarymeasures <br />unrelatedtoactualusageofthefundedservice,andwouldnotincrease <br />equity.Developingandmaintainingthiskindofpropertyspecificdata <br />maybedifficultandwouldlikelyhaveahigheradministrativecost <br />withoutachievingagreaterdegreeofequityinrelatingthefeeto <br />individualusageofthefundedservice. <br />ConsistencywithCouncilThisfeeisconsistentwithCouncilgoalsandpolicies. <br />Goals&Policies <br />Fairness&PoliticalFeasibilityThesuccessesofcitiesthathaveimplementedutilityfeesforpublic <br />servicesdemonstratesthatsuchfeescanbeseenasfairandcanbe <br />politicallyfeasible.However,asanewideafortheCityofEugene,itis <br />likelythatsubstantialdiscussionwouldberequiredbeforeaconsensus <br />onfairnessemergesandpoliticallyfeasibleisdetermined. <br />SustainabilityImpactThefeewouldhavenoadverseimpactonsustainabilitygoals. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.