Laserfiche WebLink
Meeting the Challenge <br />For the last several years, the City of Eugene’s General Fund has been projected to have large deficits <br />beginning in July of 2012. Four major factors are causing this deficit. <br />1.The City’s General Fund will be responsible for paying the cost of library operations that are <br />currently paid by a local option levy when it expires in June 30, 2011; <br />2.The cost of employee wages, benefits and retirement continue to increase; <br />3.Previously, the City has used one-time money to pay for on-going services that will need to be paid <br />for by the General Fund; and <br />4.The economic downturn, which began in 2008, has reduced the amount of money the City will be <br />adding to the General Fund. <br />The City Manager’s goal is to resolve this General Fund challenge by looking at a number of different <br />solutions. This could include ways to reduce spending or increase City revenue. Gathering citizen input <br />on service priorities as well as possible revenue sources is critical to this effort. <br />A special committee, the Meeting the Challenge Task Force, was appointed to recommend new revenue <br />sources that, together with existing revenues, would help balance General Fund budget. A description of <br />the Meeting the Challenge process is included in the Appendix. The Task Force developed one <br />recommendation as well three options for revenue. The Task Force also had several considerations they <br />felt should be taken into account as the City moves forward to solve this challenge. <br />Recommendation <br />The Meeting the Challenge Task Force recommends a Restaurant Tax of 5.0%, which would generate <br />about $14 million annually for the City. After filling the General Fund gap, any remaining funds could be <br />used to assist restaurants in covering the costs to implement the tax, to market and promote Eugene as a <br />destination, and to increase high priority services such as public safety. <br />Considerations <br />Economic development and growth will provide the City with an ongoing opportunity for more <br />revenue. City policies and procedures should stay consistent throughout different economic cycles <br />and should encourage economic development and growth to maximize resulting property tax revenue <br />to the General Fund. The Task Force recognizes that this is not a short-term solution, but believes it <br />will bring results over the long-term. <br />The Task Force is sensitive to the efforts of the State to raise revenue by changing the tax rates on <br />personal income and increasing the minimum tax for corporations. The Task Force members <br />acknowledge that an income tax would be a broad-based and equitable alternative for funding City <br />services. In addition, the Task Force recognizes that other state and local governments are discussing <br />new ways to generate revenue. Individual and businesses will be more likely to support additional <br />payments if they know what will be achieved with the money. <br />To maintain the public’s trust, when revenue is associated with services and the revenue is not <br />generated because it lacks public support, the services associated with the revenue should be scaled <br />back or eliminated. <br /> <br />