My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2012
>
CC Agenda - 02/13/12 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2012 1:48:04 PM
Creation date
2/10/2012 11:35:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/13/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
people. Ms. Thomas believed equity of education was another issue as the current enrollment data <br />provided by School District 4J indicated there were 1,481 students attending Sheldon Eugene High <br />School, compared to 1,027 students at Churchill High School and 1,069 students at North Eugene High <br />School. <br /> <br />Jean Kingrey <br />, 2372 Parkrose Drive, said the City had not considered the issues raised by project <br />opponents. The HPB deferred those issues to the council as being beyond the HPB’s mandate so the <br />council needed to consider all the information presented to the HPB before making a decision. Ms. <br />Kingrey disagreed with the City Attorney Glenn Klein’s contention that approval of Bascom Village was <br />not a quasi-judicial decision. She suggested that the fact the Housing Dispersal Policy required the <br />council to balance a variety of interests, investigate the evidence, and draw conclusions from its <br />investigation made the decision a quasi-judicial action subject to court challenge. <br /> <br />Ms. Kingrey said City staff represented that the 60-unit restriction in the Housing Dispersal Policy only <br />addressed units with two more bedrooms but the policy included no such language. She suggested the <br />council ask the City Attorney if he found a sound legal basis for that position and if it had ever been <br />asserted before the challenge to Bascom Village. She noted Housing Financial Analyst Becky Wheeler’s <br />response to her on the issue, which she provided to the council. Ms. Kingrey suggested the attorney be <br />consulted on the question of whether the inclusion of a Head Start facility in Bascom Village violated the <br />R-2 zoning for the area. She also questioned whether repeated transfers of City property at no cost or <br />below market value to a religious institution such as St. Vincent de Paul raised First Amendment issues <br />under the third test established by the United States Supreme Court in the case Lemon v. Kurtzman. <br /> <br />Virginia Thompson <br />, 2552 Britannia Place, a member of the HPB and former member of the school <br />board for School District 4J, said she did not speak for the district but her comments had been reviewed <br />by district personnel for accuracy. She reported the district indicated that neighborhood schools near the <br />property in question had considerable capacity for the number of students projected to live at Bascom <br />Village. Ms. Thompson said that enrollment in Sheldon region schools were down by more than 500 <br />students over peak enrollment in 2007. The district had proven strategies to shift enrollments, close and <br />consolidate schools, and adjust boundaries while still providing students with a quality education. It was <br />not known how many students would live in Bascom Village and Ms. Thompson suggested some might <br />already live in the area. There was two years to plan for the additional students. She emphasized that <br />stable, quality homes helped level the playing field for low-income students. <br /> <br />Stan Smith <br />, 3620 MeadowView Drive, did not support Bascom Village. He owned 23 units on Matt <br />Drive and shared the northern boundary line with Maplewood Meadows, an existing 38-unit low-income <br />development. He said that not all low-income families were undesirable neighbors but it was naïve to <br />believe they were always good neighbors. His low-income neighbors regularly abandoned grocery carts <br />on his property and his tenants experienced low-level crimes. Tenants of the low-income used his <br />complex as a shortcut to reach Coburg Road and tagged fences and buildings. He had encountered young <br />men roaming the area at night and found that intimidating. He had to hire an on-site property manager to <br />safeguard his property. <br /> <br />Jordan Papé <br />, 2362 Lakeview Drive, advocated for consistency in the implementation of City policies. <br />He said neighbors’ objections were not based on the income of prospective residents and pointed out there <br />was a trailer park directly to the north of the area. He said while it might be true Sheldon schools could <br />absorb new students from Bascom Village he questioned how the schools could accommodate students <br />from all the other current and planned development. Mr. Papé said development was occurring in the <br />area without adequate infrastructure to support it. Area schools had 50 percent more students than North <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 21, 2011 Page 8 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.