Laserfiche WebLink
General Fund dollars, and if the property was sold the proceeds must be returned to the City's CDGB <br />Fund. <br />Councilor Clark suggested a two -week delay would place the onus for information on the neighbors at no <br />cost and with no problems. <br />Councilor Brown believed a two -week delay would be a useless exercise that could possibly damage the <br />project's viability. He thought the council had the information it needed about other sites. <br />Councilor Zelenka agreed with Councilor Brown that the delay could put the project funding in jeopardy. <br />He suggested the motion would establish a precedent that resulted in affordable housing projects being <br />second - guessed at the council level. He did not support the motion. <br />Roll call vote: The motion failed, 6:2; councilors Poling and Clark voting yes. <br />Councilor Ortiz determined from Ms. Wheeler that staff was working to find a solution to the lack of <br />sidewalks serving the site. <br />Councilor Pryor said the decision was a very challenging one for him. He had learned some lessons from <br />the process about how being more mindful in integrating such projects into the community. He shared <br />the neighbors' infrastructure concerns. He wanted the council to take definitive action to ensure that the <br />street capacity issues brought up in testimony were addressed and that sidewalk access be required as part <br />of the project. <br />In regard to the project itself, Councilor Pryor pointed out the site in question was one of the City's last <br />land bank sites and a last opportunity. The decision process had been slowed to address the concerns <br />expressed by neighbors. He would work hard to ensure their fears were not realized. <br />Councilor Pryor, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to amend the motion to provide <br />that sidewalks from Parkview to Crescent be added to the project to be paid for by the <br />developer. <br />City Manager Ruiz suggested to Councilor Pryor that alternatively, the council direct him to investigate <br />ways to provide the additional infrastructure. <br />Without the concurrence of his second, Councilor Clark, Councilor Pryor withdrew his motion with the <br />expectation that the manager would return with a proposal. <br />Councilor Poling believed there were many issues that remained to be addressed, including the project's <br />consistency with the Housing Dispersal Policy, the presence of a Head Start facility on site, zoning, and <br />the proposed density. Ms. Wheeler indicated a Head Start facility could be included in the context of a <br />conditional use permit. She noted the existing precedents for such a facility. <br />Councilor Poling was concerned about the lack of sidewalks and bicycle lanes on County Farm Road as <br />well as about bus routes. He was concerned about additional traffic on Matt Drive when it was eventually <br />connected. Councilor Poling said while he supported affordable housing, he could not support the project <br />as presented. He believed the council needed to step back. He questioned whether the neighbors received <br />adequate notification of the proposal. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council November 28, 2011 Page 6 <br />Regular Meeting <br />