Laserfiche WebLink
Because of uncertainty surrounding these variables, DEQ is not prepared at this time to make a <br />definitive statement regarding other environmental impacts of different kinds of single-use bags.” <br />How does this impact our Council goal of reducing solid waste? <br />What is the council goal for reducing solid waste? <br />The current policy landscape is outlined in the overview section. Here are the main take-aways. <br />1) Plastic bags represent a very small portion of total waste. <br />2) Banning only plastic leaves paper bags still in waste. <br />3) Better recycling of either bag is not the ultimate goal. Eliminating the manufacture and use of <br />single-use disposable bags, with all the associated material and energy inputs, is the goal. <br /> <br />What are the economic costs & benefits for Eugene and Oregon? <br />To date there has not been a robust analysis of the economic impacts of plastic bag bans in Oregon or <br />Eugene. The closest evaluation was conducted for Los Angeles County by AECOM Technical Services <br />in November 2010. The report assumes that the economic impacts to the bag ban, while initially born by <br />effected businesses, would eventually pass-through to the consumer. <br /> <br />This comprehensive report included data from international studies and programs such as those in Europe, <br />Australia, and China as well as the United States, and evaluated the economic impact to consumers of a <br />plastic bag ban and a switch to paper and/or reusable bags. The study found that the per capita cost to <br />switch from free plastic bags to paper bags with a fee and reusable bags was $3.56/per person per year. <br />This took into account the total new cost (post ban) of $6.81 per capita minus the existing cost (pre ban) <br />of $3.25 per capita. Additionally, the study assessed the cost for consumers to replace retail plastic bags <br />as liners for trash at home, with a cost of $1.37 per person per year. They also included the additional <br />sales tax, which would not be an issue with Eugene consumers. <br /> <br />Therefore, using the LA County data as a proxy, we can estimate that the per capita cost to consumers <br />from a bag ban would be $4.93 annually. <br /> <br />What are the social equity implications? <br />There has not been an analysis conducted in Oregon or Eugene for the social equity implications on <br />plastic bag bans. What is evident is that many of the bag bans recently adopted on west coast cities <br />include language that provides paper bag fee exemptions or free reusable bags to individuals accessing <br />state funded services (TANF, WIC, Food Stamps, etc). <br /> <br />The AECOM Report for LA County evaluated the socioeconomic impact for a proposed ordinance that <br />would ban all plastic retail checkout bags and require at least 5cents is charged for recycled paper bags, <br />but allow an exemption for residents participating in the California Special Supplemental Food Program <br />for Women, Infants, and Children or in the Supplemental Food Program. They reported that the impact of <br />the proposed ordinance on lower-income residents of the County was expected to be negligible. <br /> <br />6 | Page <br /> <br /> <br />