Laserfiche WebLink
<br />result of the proposed plan amendment, would a reduction in recreation facilities occur. <br />Therefore, the proposed plan amendment is consistent with Goal 8. <br /> <br />Goal 9 - Economic Development: To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a <br />variety of economic activities vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of Oregon’s citizens. <br /> <br />The Oregon Administrative Rule for Goal 9 (OAR 660 Division 9) requires that the City “[p]rovide <br />for at least an adequate supply of sites of suitable sizes, types, location, and service levels for a <br />variety of industrial and commercial uses consistent with plan policies[.]” Among other things, the <br />rule requires that cities complete an “Economic Opportunities Analysis.” Based on the Economic <br />Opportunities Analysis, cities are to prepare Industrial and Commercial Development Policies. <br />Finally OAR 660-009-0025 requires that cities designate industrial and commercial lands sufficient <br />to meet short and long term needs. OAR 660-009-0010(2) provides that the detailed planning <br />requirements imposed by OAR 660 Division 9 apply “at the time of each periodic review of the <br />plan (ORS 197.712(3)).” In addition, OAR 660-009-0010(4) provides that, when a city changes its <br />plan designations of lands in excess of two acres from an industrial use designation to a non- <br />industrial use designation, or another employment use designation to any other use designation, <br />pursuant to a post acknowledgment plan amendment, it must address all applicable planning <br />requirements and (a) demonstrate that the proposed amendment is consistent with the parts of <br />its acknowledged comprehensive plan which address the requirements of OAR 660 Division 9; or <br />(b) amend its comprehensive plan to explain the proposed amendment pursuant to OAR 660 <br />Division 9; or (c) adopt a combination of (a) and (b) consistent with the requirements of Division 9. <br /> <br />The applicant proposes a change in plan designation for land in excess of two acres from Light- <br />Medium Industrial, to a non-industrial use designation. The amendments will decrease the supply <br />of available industrial land for the purpose of facilitating a mixed-use commercial and residential <br />development. As addressed in the findings below, the proposed change is consistent with the <br />Metro Plan and therefore also consistent with requirements of OAR 660 Division 9 (option (a), <br />noted above). The City’s adopted industrial land inventory is also acknowledged for compliance <br />with the requirements of Goal 9 and its Administrative Rule, and based on the last adopted <br />inventory the City has a surplus of industrial land. <br /> <br />While more recent industrial land inventories have been completed, they have yet to be adopted. <br />The City’s adopted industrial land inventory is the Metropolitan Industrial Lands Inventory Report <br />(1993) and its companion document, the Metropolitan Industrial Lands Policy Report (1993). <br />These inventory documents depict the southern portion of the subject property as a “long-term <br />site” which included approximately 19.5 acres overall (Site 65 in Subregion #2). However, most of <br />Tax Lots 100 and 200 on the site, which amounts to approximately 10 of the 19.5 acres identified <br />for this “long-term site” were and currently remain designated for Low-Density Residential use and <br />are not proposed to change as part of this plan amendment. The inventory did not include the <br />remainder of the subject site to the north as available industrial land, as that area was already <br />developed with the existing Rexius industrial use. The remaining 9.5 acres of vacant industrially <br />designated land that was included as part of the inventoried “long-term site” (on Tax Lots 1600 <br />and 3600) is proposed to be changed from industrial to residential and commercial designations as <br />part of the plan amendment. While the inventory notes wetlands as an additional constraint for <br />this site, the acreage was nonetheless included with recognition that wetland mitigation would be <br /> <br />Findings – Rexius Site/Amazon Meadows Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br />