My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1: Metro Plan Boundary Adjustment - Springfield
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2012
>
CC Agenda - 03/13/12 JEO Meeting
>
Item 1: Metro Plan Boundary Adjustment - Springfield
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 1:04:47 PM
Creation date
3/9/2012 9:38:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/13/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit E <br />(5) Severability of Plan Amendment Adoption Actions. When identical action is required <br />of two or three governing bodies on a Metro Plan Amendment, and the amendment is a <br />number of different plan changes, the following applies. Unless otherwise specified in <br />the adoption ordinance of any of the governing bodies, action by all of the governing <br />bodies to adopt some but not all of the plan changes shall result in the adoption of the <br />changes for which there is consensus and the forwarding of only those changes for <br />which there is not consensus to the Metropolitan Policy Committee under LC 12.235(5) <br />and 12.240(4) above. <br /> <br />Finding 52: The Metro Plan amendment component is considered one plan change, <br />therefore this criteria is not applicable. <br /> <br />(6) Relationship Of Amendment Process To Metro Plan Update And Periodic Review. An <br />update of any element of the Metro Plan requires initiation and approval by all three <br />jurisdictions. Amendments to the Metro Plan that result from state-mandated Periodic <br />Review require approval by all three jurisdictions. <br /> <br />Finding 53: The Metro Plan amendment entails initiation and approval from all three <br />jurisdictions. <br /> <br />APPLICABLE METRO PLAN CRITERIA REVIEW <br /> <br />In addition to criteria identified elsewhere within this document, amendments to the Metro Plan <br />also require consistency with Goal IV, Policies 3 –7 and 10 of the Metro Plan, listed below: <br /> <br />3. All amendments to the shall be classified as a Type I or Type II <br />Metro Plan <br />amendment depending upon the specific changes sought by the initiator of the <br />proposal. <br /> <br />a. A Type I amendment shall include any change to the urban growth <br />boundary(UGB) or the Plan Boundary (Plan Boundary) of the <br />Metro Plan <br />; any change that requires a goal exception to be taken under <br />Metro Plan <br />Statewide Planning Goal 2that is not related to the UGB expansion; and <br />any amendment to the text that is non-site specific. <br />Metro Plan <br /> <br />b. A Type II amendment shall include any change to the <br />Metro Plan <br />Diagram or text that is site specific and not otherwise a Type <br />Metro Plan <br />I category amendment. <br /> <br />c. Adoption or amendment of some refinement plans, functional plans, or <br />special area plans may, in some circumstances, be classified as Type I <br />or Type II amendments. Amendments to the that result from <br />Metro Plan <br />state mandated Periodic Review or updates also shall be <br />Metro Plan <br />classified as Type I or Type II amendments depending upon the specific <br />changes that would result from these actions. <br /> <br />Finding 54 : This is a Type 1 amendment as is entails a modification to the Metro Plan <br />Boundary and is therefore consistent with this requirement. <br /> <br />4. Initiation of amendments shall be as follows: <br />Metro Plan <br /> <br /> <br />Page 16 of 24 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.