My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1: Metro Plan Boundary Adjustment - Springfield
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2012
>
CC Agenda - 03/13/12 JEO Meeting
>
Item 1: Metro Plan Boundary Adjustment - Springfield
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2012 1:04:47 PM
Creation date
3/9/2012 9:38:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/13/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit E <br /> <br />(2) It has a demonstrable impact on the water, storm drainage, <br /> wastewater, or transportation facilities of the non-home city; or <br /> <br />(3) It affects the buildable land inventory by significantly adding to Low <br /> Density Residential (LDR), Campus Industrial (CI), Light-Medium <br /> Industrial (LMI), or Heavy Industrial (HI) designations or significantly <br /> reducing the Medium Density Residential (MDR), High Density <br /> Residential (HDR), or Community Commercial (CC) designations. <br /> <br />d. A jurisdiction may amend a designation without causing <br />Metro Plan <br />Regional Impact when this action is taken to: compensate for <br />reductions in buildable land caused by protection of newly discovered <br />natural resources within its own jurisdiction; or accommodate the <br />contiguous expansion of an existing business with a site-specific <br />requirement. e. Decisions on all Type II amendments within city limits <br />shall be the sole responsibility of the home city. <br /> <br /> <br />Finding 56:This amendment entails a Plan Boundary change that triggers one or <br />more of the criteria identified in Policy 5. a., therefore, all three governing bodies are <br /> <br />decision makers. <br /> <br />6. Public hearings by the governing bodies for amendments requiring <br />Metro Plan <br />participation from one or two jurisdictions shall be held within 120 days of the <br />initiation date. amendments that require a final decision from all <br />Metro Plan <br />three governing bodies shall be concluded within 180 days of the initiation <br />date. When more than one jurisdiction participates in the decision, the <br />Planning Commissions of the participating jurisdictions shall conduct a joint <br />public hearing and forward that record and their recommendations to their <br />respective elected officials. The elected officials also shall conduct a joint <br />public hearing prior to making a final decision. The time frames prescribed in <br />connection with Type II amendment processes can be waived if the <br />Metro Plan <br />applicant agrees to the waiver. <br /> <br />Finding 57: As this amendment requires a decision form all three jurisdictions, a <br />public hearing must be held within 180 from the formal initiation date. The formal initiation <br />date for this amendment is June 1, 2011. A public hearing for this amendment is scheduled <br />for July 19, 2011, which is within the required time specified. This will be a joint hearing of <br />the three Planning Commissions. The recommendation from the three Planning <br />Commissions will be forwarded to the elected officials who shall also conduct a joint public <br />hearing prior to making a final decision. <br /> <br />7. If all participating jurisdictions reach a consensus to approve a proposed <br />amendment, substantively identical ordinances affecting the changes shall be <br />adopted. Where there is a consensus to deny a proposed amendment, it may <br />not be re-initiated, except by one of the three governing bodies, for one year. <br />Amendments for which there is no consensus shall be referred to the <br />Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC) for additional study, conflict resolution, <br />and recommendation back to the governing bodies. <br /> <br /> <br />Page 18 of 24 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.