Laserfiche WebLink
Diane Thurlow <br />, Ward 3, said any additional expenses created by the Occupy Eugene camp cost should <br />be borne by the City Councilors who voted to support the camp. She did not want to pay for the camp. <br />She believed the campers were breaking the law. She said it was the council’s job to take care of the <br />homeless and she advised the council to “deal with it.” <br /> <br />Becky Lemler <br />, Elmira, suggested the money spent to police the Occupy Eugene camp could have been <br />used to feed the homeless. She objected that Occupy Eugene had been allowed to disregard laws and <br />occupy public property at public expense. She suggested that Occupy Eugene’s original message was lost <br />when it allowed illegal activity at the camp and harbored minor runaways, felons, and sex offenders. She <br />understood there were reports that people at the camp were preparing weapons to use to fight the police if <br />asked to disband. Ms. Lemler feared Eugene would become a magnet for protestors from other <br />communities that had closed their Occupy camps and called for the camp to be ended before they <br />converged on the community and caused more problems. <br /> <br />Jonathan Schwartz <br />, Ward 7, said Occupy Eugene wished to be accountable and work with the City <br />toward solutions. He did not think that closing the camp was the right thing to do and suggested that the <br />camp be allowed to continue until the spring. He believed that if the City worked with Occupy Eugene <br />they would find a mutual solution. He referred the council to his written communication. <br /> <br />Ruth Duemler <br />, Ward 3, hoped the council extended the exemption as she did not think winter was the <br />right time to move the camp. She shared her positive experience attending Occupy Eugene rallies, saying <br />they were attended by a diverse group of people, were well-organized, and the results well-communicated <br />to other participants. It had been an amazing experience. She hoped all councilors could visit the site. <br /> <br />David Ivan Piccioni <br />, Ward 1, said Occupy Eugene was a means of expression for the poor and <br />disenfranchised. He believed it would be undemocratic to prevent those populations from exerting <br />political power through protest and organizing. <br /> <br />Jerry Smith, <br /> Ward 2, spoke of the work that Occupy Eugene did with the homeless at no cost to the <br />taxpayer. He spoke of the injustices he perceived in the economic system and said Occupy Eugene was <br />trying to bring economic and social justice to the country. He asked the council to allow the camp to <br />continue. He maintained the community supported the camp. Mr. Smith believed it would be tantamount <br />to terrorism to tear down the tents in the middle of winter. <br /> <br />Thomas Price <br />, Ward 8, asked the council to extend the camping ban exemption for Occupy Eugene. He <br />spoke of the economic hardships many residents were experiencing. He had been to the Occupy Eugene <br />camp and knew it was a good thing. <br /> <br />Shaun Haskins <br />, Springfield, shared his view of the origins of Occupy Eugene, which he found in <br />economic inequality, leaving the wealthy the de facto policy makers. <br /> <br />Carol Berg Caldwell <br />, Ward 3, suggested that if the Occupy Eugene camp was closed the City would <br />incur costs in other areas. She spoke of the plight and despair of the homeless and suggested that the <br />costs of the camp were “chump change” when compared with the benefits the homeless were receiving <br />from the camp. She asked that the council allow a reasonable extension that gave services time to <br />coalesce around a broader community effort. <br /> <br />Michelle Townsend <br />, homeless, submitted a petition with 1,700 signatures to the mayor and council in <br />support of continuing the Occupy Eugene camp. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council December 12, 2011 Page 2 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />