Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Clark asked staff to prepare an estimate of costs in time for the December 14 discussion. He <br />also wanted an estimate of the number of people who would cooperate with the deadline and how many <br />would not. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark was challenged to support the motion because it gave tacit approval to the camp site. He <br />was interested in hearing further discussion on December 14 but continued to be concerned the City was <br />subsidizing a protest. He defended Occupy Eugene’s right to protest but did not want to spend tax dollars <br />to further a protest that was not supported by all residents. <br /> <br />City Manager Ruiz pointed out the motion did not call for the termination of the camp in 45 days. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling indicated tentative support for the motion. He questioned the source of funding and <br />how it affected other services. He recommended the funding come from Council Contingency Funds. <br />Councilor Poling was concerned about extending the exemption for 45 days. He preferred to retain the <br />December 15 date and let staff determine how to close the camp down as soon as practical. He objected <br />to continued extension of the exemption. The camp was not needed to realize the other elements of the <br />motion, which he supported as common sense steps. He anticipated further discussion of that date. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka said each Occupy movement was different and in Eugene it had focused on <br />homelessness. He believed that Occupy Eugene captured people’s imaginations and at least their <br />attention. He believed that Occupy Eugene represented an opportunity for meaningful change in <br />regarding to homelessness. The intention of his motion was that the camp would close at the end of 45 <br />days. Transition services would be in place to move the campers into more stable conditions with better <br />services. Regarding costs, Councilor Zelenka anticipated the manager would provide the council with <br />funding options at the December 14 meeting and further anticipated the manager would provide ranges of <br />cost. <br /> <br />Councilor Farr was glad for the delay because he hoped it would provide more answers. He continued to <br />be concerned about safety and planned to visit the camp. He had serious concerns about sanitation and <br />questioned where the gray water was going but would keep an open mind and would see if his concerns <br />could be alleviated. <br /> <br />Councilor Brown questioned whether 45 days was sufficient time to transition the event. He suggested <br />the council might need to revisit that decision given the complexity of the tasks that lay ahead. He agreed <br />with the remarks of Councilor Zelenka. <br /> <br />Speaking to the issue of money, Councilor Brown suggested that the revenue from the Moss Street <br />vacation could be one funding source. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy recalled that the bulk of police-related expenses came from the protests that occurred at the <br />beginning of the camp. She acknowledged that more expenses had been accrued over time. She <br />acknowledged that Occupy Eugene was a political movement that was shining a big light on the problem <br />of the homeless. She thanked the 70 people who signed up to speak and said she tried to treat all fairly <br />whether she agreed or disagreed with their views. She had wanted to ensure the council got to its decision <br />point on the issue. Mayor Piercy believed inequity was a big problem. She thanked those present for <br />caring. <br /> <br />The motion passed, 7:1; Councilor Clark voting no. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the meeting at 9:23 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council December 12, 2011 Page 8 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />