Laserfiche WebLink
had been studying the impacts of the alternative and would present its findings. No action was requested <br />of the council. <br />General Manager Kilcoyne reported that LTD submitted a draft environmental analysis for the LPA to the <br />Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in September 2011. He anticipated the FTA would determine <br />whether to certify the analysis in March, which would trigger a 45 -day public comment period. After the <br />FTA reviewed the comments General Manager Kilcoyne anticipated the agency would issue a Finding of <br />No Significant Impact (FONSI); otherwise, LTD would have to return the federal funds it received for <br />planning to the FTA. He said Mr. Duncan would present his real estate analysis, which was part of the <br />environmental analysis. <br />General Manager Kilcoyne noted that President Barack Obama's budget, released earlier that day, <br />included $19 million for project development. <br />Mr. Duncan led the council through a PowerPoint presentation entitled LTD EmX Property Impacts <br />Analysis Proposed West Eugene EmX Extension. The presentation included a series of maps showing the <br />impact of the LPA on properties along the LPA route and potential acquisitions. Mr. Duncan offered the <br />caveat that no actual appraisals had yet occurred. He noted his assigned scope of work, which was to <br />provide a general property description of each affected property; review acquisition maps; identify <br />potential land use or code issues, existing property constraints, or potential direct property effects <br />resulting from the project; identify any direct or indirect potential business /property effects; and <br />recommend mitigation strategies to minimize those effects where possible. <br />Mr. Duncan noted the most potentially impacted properties (Adult Shop and King's Asian Market). He <br />described the impact of the project on parking along the route and shared examples of possible parking <br />mitigation approaches. He shared an example of a building impact on 6 Avenue. Mr. Duncan noted <br />potential land use and code compliance issues as they related to legal non - conforming uses and legal non- <br />conforming situations. He noted the possibility that sidewalks might require narrowing in some areas <br />along the route. <br />Mr. Duncan reported that 118 properties, or 24.3 of the properties along the route, would be impacted by <br />the project; of those properties, less than 2 percent of the total site area of those properties was proposed <br />for acquisition. He noted the percentage range of impact on the affected properties. Mr. Duncan <br />provided a general summary of the proposed acquisition areas, reporting that 14 percent of affected <br />properties required no acquisition; LTD proposed to acquire less than 100 square feet on 13 properties, <br />proposed to acquire between 100 and 1,000 square feet on 55 properties, and proposed to acquire over <br />1,000 square feet on 36 properties; 6 of those properties required more than 3,000 square feet. <br />Mr. Duncan shared a property impact summary of the major property impacts and the number of <br />impacted properties. <br />Councilors asked questions clarifying the information presented. <br />Mr. Brown requested information about the number of on- street metered parking spaces that would be <br />lost along downtown streets as a result of the project. He also requested that LTD provide the council <br />with copies of Mr. Duncan's complete analysis once it was available. <br />The council then considered the Consent Calendar, scheduled for action at the regular meeting scheduled <br />at 7:30 p.m. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council February 13, 2012 Page 3 <br />Work Session <br />