My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 01/25/12 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2012
>
CC Minutes - 01/25/12 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2012 11:06:57 AM
Creation date
4/16/2012 4:07:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/25/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Farr expressed interest in knowing if the dispersed crime was at the same level as the downtown <br />crime level. <br />Mr. Zelenka also supported retaining the sunset. He wanted to see more statistics about crime in adjacent <br />areas and wanted more information about the advocacy program. Lt. Kamkar acknowledged the <br />advocacy program had not been used and believed it was because people found the information <br />complicated. He thought changes could be made to make the program clearer and more effective and <br />suggested judges could also remind defendants about the program. <br />Mr. Zelenka also considered the motion premature. <br />Mr. Pryor supported the intent behind the motion but wanted to give the manager time to process the <br />concepts raised by the council and the public in a thoughtful way. He was unprepared to address the issue <br />of the sunset without more discussion of its relationship to other public safety tools the City was <br />deploying in downtown. <br />Ms. Taylor wanted to hear from people who had been excluded. She believed that those who were unable <br />to understand the process or who lacked knowledge about the system would fail to appear and would be <br />unable to fight the exclusion. She also questioned where the City would jail people who violated an <br />exclusion order in the absence of sufficient jail beds. <br />With the consent of his second, Mr. Farr, Mr. Clark withdrew his motion. <br />B. WORK SESSION <br />Envision Eugene: Low - Density Residential Re- Designation <br />Associate Planner Heather O'Donnell led the council through a PowerPoint presentation regarding the <br />community's low- density residential land need. Planning Director Lisa Gardner and Metropolitan <br />Community Section Manager Carolyn Weiss were also present for the item. The presentation included <br />maps showing the areas proposed for possible resignation. Ms. O'Donnell reported that the Planning <br />Commission supported the staff recommendation for North Eugene and Option C for West Eugene. <br />Councilors asked questions clarifying the details of the presentation. <br />Ms. Weiss reviewed the project timeline, indicating staff would return with a draft recommendation in <br />March, which would be followed by community forums, a public hearing, and council action in May. <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the meeting at 1:19 p.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />/3 t�, Y u L <br />Beth Forrest <br />City Recorder <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council January 25, 2012 Page 3 <br />Work Session <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.