Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Vickie Nelson <br />, Ward 1, asked the council to let the DPSZ sunset. She asked where the people excluded <br />from downtown went and suggested they went to someone’s backyard or lived on the river banks because <br />they had to be somewhere. They were out of sight but people should still care. She questioned the <br />constitutionality of the DPSZ and suggested it had not been challenged because the homeless lacked <br />lawyers. <br /> <br />Donna Riddle <br />, a resident of Lane County, did not think the DPSZ worked because of what she saw when <br />she visited downtown. She termed the zone un-American. She questioned where excluded people would <br />go to use the bathroom if they could not use the bathrooms in downtown. She recommended the council <br />let the zone sunset. She also recommended the City fund a day center and a homeless shelter. <br /> <br />Irene Cardenas <br />, Ward 1, opposed the DPSZ. She advocated for more harmonious interactions between <br />the police and citizens. She spoke of the trauma of such exclusions. She also recommended that police <br />provide homeless people with cards with information about where they could recreate, meditate, garden, <br />eat, and camp. <br /> <br />Randy Cain <br />, Ward 1, believed the ordinance should take into the account the fact that some people were <br />attracted to downtown by the steam heat system, privacy partitions, and public bathrooms. He asked that <br />the DPSZ be allowed to expire. He did not want to pay to fight a lawsuit against the City. <br /> <br />Bill Whalen <br />, Ward 5, representing the Local Government Affairs Council of the Eugene Area Chamber <br />of Commerce, expressed the council’s support for the DPSZ because of the current lack of jail capacity. <br />He said the council believed the DPSZ was conducted thoughtfully and responsibly. He said the DPSZ <br />had deterred downtown crime and led to deceased trespass, alcohol-related crimes, and property crimes. <br /> <br />Joseph Newton <br />, Ward 7, agreed with the remarks of Ms. Regan and Ms. Syrett. He maintained the <br />DPSZ was counter-productive and useless and was directed against annoyances rather than real crimes, <br />such as the assault he experienced at Kesey Square without a police response. <br /> <br />Ruth Deumler <br />, Ward 3, agreed with the remarks of previous speakers and urged the council to end the <br />DPSZ. She advocated for more public bathrooms and for publicly funded lockers so homeless people <br />could store their belongings during the day and did not have to carry them around. She also advocated for <br />a wet bed facility and a full-time community center for youth. <br /> <br />Alley Valkyrie <br />, Ward 1, opposed the DPSZ because it punished people for a crime they had yet to be <br />convicted of. She opposed excluding the homeless from downtown because that was where they lived <br />and received assistance. She averred that exclusions “happened in secret” and that she had a right to <br />know when a member of her community was excluded. . <br /> <br />Walter Hunt <br />, Ward 3, said he would not support the DPSZ if he believed it was used against Occupy <br />Eugene and the homeless. Instead, he saw it used against really scary people doing really criminal things <br />repeatedly, which led to their exclusion. He believed due process occurred because of a judge reviewed <br />each exclusion order. Mr. Ward recommended that the council retain the DPSZ for the time being and <br />that it direct the EPD to follow through on its review so it could convince the council that the zone <br />worked. <br /> <br />David Mort <br />, Ward 5, supported the retention of the DPSZ. In the three years he had worked downtown <br />he had seen a drastic improvement in downtown conditions, particularly at the corner of Olive Street and <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 21, 2012 Page 5 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />