My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Action - Ord. on Land Use Code Amend - Infill Standards
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2012
>
CC Agenda - 05/14/12 Meeting
>
Item 5: Action - Ord. on Land Use Code Amend - Infill Standards
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2012 1:32:00 PM
Creation date
5/10/2012 5:27:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/14/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Goal 10 - Housing. To provide for the housing needs of citizens of the state. <br /> <br />Goal 10 requires that communities plan for and maintain an inventory of buildable residential land for <br />needed housing units. Although the amendments address residential development standards, they do <br />not impact the supply or availability of residential lands included in the documented supply of <br />“buildable land” that is available for residential development as inventoried in the acknowledged 1999 <br />Residential Lands Study (RLS). <br /> <br />The following table provides the net density assumptions used in the RLS for multi-family (RLS, page <br />22) and the associated maximum allowable densities per Eugene Code Table 9.2750: <br /> <br />Assumed Average Net Density for Maximum Allowable Net Density <br />Plan Designation <br />Multi-Family Housing (RLS) per Eugene Code <br />Low Density Residential (LDR) <br />14.0 14.0 (R-1 zone) <br /> <br />Medium Density Residential (MDR) <br />20.0 28.0 (R-2 zone) <br /> <br />High Density Residential (HDR) 56.0 (R-3 zone) <br />35.0 <br />112.0 (R-4 zone) <br /> <br />The amendments pertaining to allowed intrusions, driveways and parking areas, garbage and recycling, <br />and bicycling parking do not have an impact on the level of development or densities currently <br />permitted through existing code and zoning regulations. The amendment pertaining to building height <br />in the south university areas only apply to a limited number of properties. There is nothing in the <br />record that raises concerns as to the City’s ability to remain consistent with the assumed densities for <br />the area in question. <br /> <br />While the amendment pertaining to the multi-family development open space standards removes an <br />exemption to open space for higher density projects, this amendment also provides more design <br />flexibility and clarity about where and how open space can be provided. For example, 10-foot wide <br />interior yards can be used to accommodate required open space, whereas previously that was not <br />possible. To qualify for the open space exemption (which allows a multi-family development to not <br />dedicate a portion of the site as required open space), a project must meet approximately 80 percent <br />of the maximum allowable density in the zone. For example, in the R-4 High Density Residential zone <br />(which implements the HDR plan designation), a multi-family development that provides 90 units per <br />net acre is exempt from providing open space. Given that the open space exemption is only relevant <br />to those projects at the upper end of the allowable density ranges of the R-3 and R-4 zones, this <br />amendment will have no material impact on the assumed densities, which are well below this level. <br /> <br />Testimony was submitted asserting that as a result of the code amendments, particularly the removal <br />of the open space exemption, achievable density for multi-family developments would be reduced by <br />15 to 20 percent. Additional testimony provided a list of multi-family projects and duplexes developed <br />over the past several years by a local building design and construction company, including the number <br />of units constructed and the estimated loss of units due to the code amendments. The majority of <br />these projects were constructed in the R-3 Limited High Density Residential and R-4 High Density <br />Residential zones, in a HDR designation. Although it is not possible to verify the accuracy of the <br />estimated reduction in units, nevertheless, it does appear that the majority of projects would still far <br />Findings of Consistency (CA 11-2) 4 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.