My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1: Ambulance Transport System Sustainability
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2012
>
CC Agenda - 05/24/12 Joint Elected Officials
>
Item 1: Ambulance Transport System Sustainability
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2012 2:00:41 PM
Creation date
5/18/2012 2:00:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/24/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JEO <br />OINTLECTEDFFICIALS <br />AIS <br />GENDATEMUMMARY <br />ACTION: AMBULANCE TRANSPORT SYSTEM SUSTAINABILITY <br />Meeting Date: May 24, 2012 Agenda Item Number: 1 <br />Department: Eugene and Springfield Fire Departments Staff Contacts: Randall B. Groves, Chief <br />Lane Rural Fire/Rescue District Dale Borland, Chief <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br />The Joint Elected Officials Ambulance Transport Task Force (ATTF) recognizes ambulance transport as <br />a core service that is accessible to the residents and visitors of central Lane County regardless of ability <br />to pay. Seen as a regional system, Eugene Fire & EMS Department, Springfield Fire & Life Safety <br />Department, and Lane Rural Fire/Rescue District provide ambulance transport for a majority of Lane <br />County citizens. Rural Metro Ambulance, a private ambulance service providing select non-emergency <br />transports, and LifeFlight, air ambulance transportation for the most critical patients, augment the <br />system. The three governmental providers continue to experience a financial crisis attributed largely to <br />the federal government’s decline in Medicare and Medicaid payments and the economic recession <br />resulting in an increase in utilization by those underinsured and uninsured. All three regional providers <br />are projecting annual financial deficits beginning in FY13. <br />BACKGROUND <br />Before the implementation of the Ambulance Fee Schedule on April 1, 2002, ambulance suppliers <br />received payment from Medicare on a “Reasonable Charge Basis.” Medicare would pay 80 percent of <br />the allowable amount and the remaining balance was the responsibility of the patient. This allowed <br />transport providers broad flexibility in setting rates and assured recovery of costs. <br />The Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 added a new section 1834(1) to the Social Security Act, which <br />mandated the implementation of a national fee schedule. This section also required ambulance providers <br />and suppliers to accept the Medicare allowed charge, including patient co-payments as payment in full <br />and eliminated the ability to bill the patient or another insurance provider for the balance of the <br />reasonable charge. <br />Put simply, the national fee schedule, which covers 60 to 70 percent of all transports, does not allow <br />most ambulance providers to recover the full cost of providing the service. Instead, where we once had <br />the ability to collect the full billable charge (which has risen over the years from $535 to $1,600 per <br />transport), we are now reimbursed between $200 and $400, depending on the type of call. Medicaid, the <br />State of Oregon’s health insurance program, reimburses at a similar range. <br />While Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement reductions are the primary reason that emergency medical <br />transport in our region has become a revenue-negative enterprise, two national trends are also <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.