My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 02/29/12 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2012
>
CC Minutes - 02/29/12 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2012 11:05:54 AM
Creation date
5/22/2012 5:26:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/29/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Piercy appreciated what the City had done to repair streets in the Harlow area as a result of public <br />pressure but believed the City needed to be cognizant of the social equity of its expenditures. <br />Ms. Taylor thanked staff for its work. She reported that she had received more compliments and thanks <br />for the street repairs than anything else and those she spoke to had expressed support for another bond <br />measure. <br />Mr. Farr concurred with Mayor Piercy's remarks regarding North Seneca Street, saying it was one <br />example of many throughout the community. He agreed the City should revisit its maintenance approach <br />toward such facilities as alleys for the reasons mentioned by Mayor Piercy. He agreed with Ms. Taylor <br />that citizen satisfaction regarding the bond measure results was high. <br />Mr. Farr asked how much of the deterioration of West 11` and West 18` avenues could be attributed to <br />the lack of the West Eugene Parkway, which would have accommodated some of the traffic that now <br />went down those arterials. Mr. Corey said the City had not performed such an analysis. Generally, <br />deterioration on asphalt streets was proportionate to time and load. Mr. Farr suggested the City was <br />spending more to maintain those streets than it would have had the parkway been in place. <br />Mr. Zelenka maintained that the West Eugene Parkway would never have been built because "the feds <br />would have stopped it." He agreed with Ms. Taylor about constituent satisfaction and noted the local jobs <br />that were created as a result of the bond. <br />Mr. Zelenka said without further funding, the maintenance backlog would grow. The City must have $15 <br />million to $18 million more to make progress. He recalled past discussion of a transportation system fee <br />and suggested it had more of a nexus to road repair than a bond. In addition, he believed it was unfair for <br />Eugene residents to pay full cost of the roads when 50 percent of those using them paid nothing. He <br />maintained a transportation system fee "would get us there" and asked for further information about the <br />status of that mechanism. Mr. Corey had nothing new to report. He suggested the issue was complicated <br />by the current economy. He thought the City needed to continue to consider such a fee and reminded the <br />council that the City had been limited in the past by its ability to collect the fee. <br />City Manager Ruiz reminded Mr. Zelenka that the council had asked staff to return with information in <br />the near -term to support future discussions about different taxing mechanisms. <br />Mr. Brown thanked Public Works and the members of the panel. He also thanked the council for <br />developing the bond measure, which he considered a great model for the future to address problems <br />where there was wide agreement. <br />Mr. Poling also thanked the panel, staff, and the voters. Speaking to the potential of renewing the bond, <br />Mr. Poling acknowledged his concerns about passing such a bond in the current economic climate. <br />Mr. Pryor thanked staff and the panel. He believed that with the support of the voters, the repair backlog <br />had been brought under control to some degree. He also commended the council for taking action to <br />address the backlog, but agreed with Mr. Zelenka that there was more work to be done. He wondered if <br />there was a way to consolidate the council's discussions about taxes or approach them in a more unified <br />way given there were only so many taxing mechanisms available. Mr. Pryor did not want the council to <br />forget the operations and maintenance backlog and questioned how the City could approach that and what <br />the community would be comfortable funding. Street repair was one of the most important expenditures <br />the City was making and he anticipated it would continue to be an important topic. He did not want to <br />lose the progress that had been made. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council February 29, 2012 Page 2 <br />Work Session <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.