My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMinutes - 02/23/04 WS
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2004
>
CCMinutes - 02/23/04 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:28:55 AM
Creation date
8/10/2004 10:18:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
because of the local economy, the amount of payroll tax revenue had been flat for the past two or three <br />years. She said that LTD's expenses were growing at the rate of four to six percent a year and a number of <br />cost-cutting measures had been imposed, such as laying off some administrative staff and cutting some <br />service routes. She anticipated that over the next three years $1.8 million in service cuts would be achieved. <br />She said the first of those cuts LTD was currently considering represented $500,000 of that amount and the <br />remaining cuts would be dependent on a number of factors, including a mm around in the economy, <br />increased payroll tax revenue, and the results of union contract negotiations. She said another factor in <br />LTD's budget was the need to provide a 20 percent local match from the payroll tax revenue in order to <br />spend federal formula funds on capital projects. <br /> <br />Mr. Kleger commented that although LTD was faced with the need to reduce costs, it had held services <br />harmless to date and trimmed costs in all other areas; it was forced to cut services beginning in the fall of <br />2004 and implement adjustments to group pass fares. He said the dilemma was to cuts costs in ways that <br />had the least impact on the fewest number of people and LTD was holding open houses and public hearings <br />on the proposed cuts to obtain feedback from the public. He encouraged the council to provide input as <br />well. <br /> <br />Mr. Kleger offered the council good news about a recent capital expenditure. He reported that that the <br />automatic vehicle location/automatic passenger count radio system appeared to be successful and would <br />provide LTD with accurate information about ridership patterns by geographic location and time of day that <br />was automatically reported by computer to a central location. He said that eventually the system would be <br />able to provide real-time information that customers could access to identify what buses served an area and <br />the arrival times at a specific location. <br /> <br />Mr. Gaydos discussed the impact of the Central Area Transportation Study (CATS) on LTD operations. <br />He agreed with Ms. Nathanson's assessment that frequency, timeliness, and running times were major <br />factors in customer satisfaction. He said that when LTD built the central downtown Eugene station, it was <br />depending on 10th Avenue being a one-way street and if that changed it would cause some operational <br />problems. He stated that LTD would serve the federal courthouse once decisions were made about the street <br />design and suggested that courthouse service could be part of the Breeze service package. He said once <br />improvements in the courthouse district were designed and completed LTD would be better able to respond <br />with a service plan. He noted that the Breeze service had been very successful and said that LTD had <br />performed significant due diligence in its effort to obtain a ~green" vehicle, but was struggling to keep the <br />Breeze vehicles on the road. He said that the fare would continue to be 25 cents. <br /> <br />Mr. Gaydos concluded by reminding the council that BRT and LTD were part of the community's transit <br />system and it was not a question of LTD versus the City of Eugene or the City of Springfield. He said that <br />LTD was trying to develop the best transportation system possible in partnership with the community. He <br />noted earlier expressions of concern about extended timelines and expenditures and warned that shifting <br />priorities again would cause further extensions and additional expenses. He asked for community support <br />and partnership with LTD to move the transportation system forward. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said that he would support BRT on Coburg Road if LTD could guarantee an exclusive right-of- <br />way in keeping with the council resolution. Mr. Gaydos replied that LTD would be happy to do that if <br />councilors could convince community members to be supportive. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly complimented LTD on the quality and coverage of daily service. He also noted the important <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 23, 2004 Page 6 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.