My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20492
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2012 No. 20485-20503
>
Ordinance No. 20492
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2012 3:54:53 PM
Creation date
6/4/2012 3:43:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
5/14/2012
Document_Number
20492
CMO_Effective_Date
6/15/2012
Author
Kitty Piercy
Supplemental fields
Document_Title
An Ordinance Concerning Infill Compatibility Standards Related to Multi-Family Developments, ...; and Amending Sections 9.0500, 9.2750, 9.2751, 9.3125, 9.3626, 9.5500, 9.6105, 9.6410, 9.6740, 9.6745, and 9.8030 of the Eugene Code, 1971.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Goal 10 - Housing To provide for the housing needs of citizens of the state. <br />Goal 10 requires that communities plan for and maintain an inventory of buildable residential land for <br />needed housing units. Although the amendments address residential development standards, they do <br />not impact the supply or availability of residential lands included in the documented supply of <br />"buildable land" that is available for residential development as inventoried in the acknowledged 1999 <br />Residential Lands Study (RLS). <br />The following table provides the net density assumptions used in the RLS for multi - family (RLS, page <br />22) and the associated maximum allowable densities per Eugene Code Table 9.2750: <br />The amendments pertaining to allowed intrusions, driveways and parking areas, garbage and recycling, <br />and bicycling parking do not have an impact on the level of development or densities currently <br />permitted through existing code and zoning regulations. The amendment pertaining to building height <br />in the south university areas only apply to a limited number of properties. There is nothing in the <br />record that raises concerns as to the City's ability to remain consistent with the assumed densities for <br />the area in question. <br />While the amendment pertaining to the multi - family development open space standards removes an <br />exemption to open space for higher density projects, this amendment also provides more design <br />flexibility and clarity about where and how open space can be provided. For example, 10 -foot wide <br />interior yards can be used to accommodate required open space, whereas previously that was not <br />possible. To qualify for the open space exemption (which allows a multi - family development to not <br />dedicate a portion of the site as required open space), a project must meet approximately 80 percent <br />of the maximum allowable density in the zone. For example, in the R -4 High Density Residential zone <br />(which implements the HDR plan designation), a multi - family development that provides 90 units per <br />net acre is exempt from providing open space. Given that the open space exemption is only relevant <br />to those projects at the upper end of the allowable density ranges of the R -3 and R -4 zones, this <br />amendment will have no material impact on the assumed densities, which are well below this level. <br />Testimony was submitted asserting that as a result of the code amendments, particularly the removal <br />of the open space exemption, achievable density for multi - family developments would be reduced by <br />15 to 20 percent. Additional testimony provided a list of multi - family projects and duplexes developed <br />over the past several years by a local building design and construction company, including the number <br />of units constructed and the estimated loss of units due to the code amendments. The majority of <br />these projects were constructed in the R -3 Limited High Density Residential and R -4 High Density <br />Residential zones, in a HDR designation. Although it is not possible to verify the accuracy of the <br />estimated reduction in units, nevertheless, it does appear that the majority of projects would still far <br />Findings of Consistency (CA 11 -2) 4 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.