My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMinutes - 01/21/04 WS
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2004
>
CCMinutes - 01/21/04 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:28:52 AM
Creation date
8/10/2004 10:23:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Pap6 commented that his interest in forming an airport district was not so much of a financial concern <br />as it was to recognize that it was in fact a regional facility. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Pap6, Airport Manager Bob Noble stated that approximately 50 percent <br />of the ticketed passengers flying out of the airport were from Eugene zip codes. He noted, in response to a <br />further question, that there were seven community commercial airports in the State of Oregon and two of <br />them were districts. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner asserted it was not the City's sole responsibility to have its taxpayers provide the level of <br />service for noncity residents that the larger district options provided. He encouraged staff to actively work <br />on options that brought the school districts together. <br /> <br />In response to questions from Ms. Taylor, Mr. Corey reiterated that the airport cost no money from the <br />General Fund and that the airport staff was paid for by the airport. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asserted that the airport should have been set up as a regional district when it was developed. <br />She commented that there was nothing to lose. <br /> <br />Mr. Corey disagreed. He noted that during the recent snow storm the City had been able to share equipment <br />and personnel resources and this had been a great benefit to the Public Works Department. He said without <br />this, the department would have been capitalizing the services ;;up front." He stated that the Central Service <br />allocation raised the City's ability to provide a general level of service to the greater organization. He <br />opined that an elected board for district operation might not share the City's ideals nor have its best interests <br />at heart. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked if the City gained money from the airport. Mr. Noble responded that the airport provided <br />$360,000 per year for its portion of the central services. He asserted that there was economy in having the <br />airport be part of the municipal structure. He stated that there was not a way to create a surplus of revenue <br />from the airport because it would constitute ;;revenue diversion," but there was a way to recapture all of the <br />work created by the airport within the organization. <br /> <br />Mr. Taylor said a change in airport governance would cause the City to lose the integration that was <br />possible in terms of overall service with a governing body that does more than a single purpose provider of <br />service. Some opportunity for the public to be involved would be possible through the way the board would <br />operate, but assets that had been developed since 1919 would be ;;handed off" to someone yet unknown. He <br />called attention to the three years of work associated with working with the County to go through the Metro <br />Plan amendments and to raise the question for the voters. He commented that it was difficult to contemplate <br />adding to the workload in this way at a time when the City had ;;ambitious challenges" to undertake. He <br />related that it was difficult for staff to understand what question the airport district would change the answer <br />to and what was being sought by making this change at this time. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon stated that a district would be a separate governing body that would have the authority to tax. <br />She opined that if the current airport governance structure was not broken, it did not need to be fixed. She <br />called attention to the dearth of interest expressed by those who had been sent letters regarding a discussion <br />on airport governance. She recommended the item be taken off the table. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 21, 2004 Page 2 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.