Laserfiche WebLink
D. Approval of Additional Funding for West University Neighborhood Lighting <br /> E. Approval of West University Neighborhood Alley Improvements <br /> F. Adoption of Resolution 4783 Acknowledging Receipt of the City of Eugene, Oregon, Com- <br /> prehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2003 <br /> <br /> Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Poling, moved to approve the items on <br /> the Consent Calendar. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman stated that she had submitted corrections to the minutes electronically. Mayor Torrey <br />deemed them corrected, as there had been no objections. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman pulled Item E. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly said he had submitted a correction to the minutes via e-mail. Mayor Torrey stated that, <br />without objections, the correction was approved. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap~ pulled Item C. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion to approve the Consent Calendar, with the exceptions of <br /> items E and C, passed by unanimous vote, 7:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked staff if West University Neighborhood alley improvements would preclude the <br />opportunity to pursue 100 percent assessment or another strategy aside from the block grant monies. Mark <br />Schoening, City Engineer, responded that the block grant would not preclude assessment strategies. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor registered her opposition to mandatory assessments on residents for improvements that <br />may or may not be of benefit to them. She asked staff to estimate the range of cost for the individual <br />property owner. Mr. Schoening replied that the project was slated to cost $1.6 million in its entirety and <br />the estimated assessments were between $2,000 and $4,000. Councilor Taylor opined that unless a <br />neighborhood was in complete agreement on a petition for improvements, she could not support assessing <br />the residents. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly noted that this item would be before the council several more times. He stressed that the <br />item under consideration was merely to initiate the design process. He stated that staff was going to <br />conduct thorough public outreach and residents would certainly have abundant opportunity to provide <br />input. He commented that he would be attentive to the few single-family homes with owners in residence <br />that were left in the neighborhood so that it would not create an undue burden on them. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion to approve Item E passed, 6:1; Councilor Taylor voting in <br /> opposition. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap~ commented that he was concerned with the relationship between the City and the Eugene <br />Water & Electric Board (EWEB). He felt that when perfunctorily granting them the authority to take on <br />$30 million in debt, more background information was in order. He stated that he would not vote against <br />Item C at this time. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 12, 2004 Page 7 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />