Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment 3 <br />M E M O R A N D U M <br /> EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD <br />TO:Mayor Piercy, Eugene City Council and City Manager Jon Ruiz <br />FROM:Roger Gray, General Manager <br />DATE:July 2, 2012 <br />SUBJECT:EWEB Budget Update <br />This memo is intended to brief you on the Eugene Water & Electric Board’s 2013 budgeting process. As you <br />are aware, the 2013 budget is being developed under a very different context than previous budgets. EWEB <br />began service priorities discussions withthe Board and internal cost-cutting/efficiency measures in 2011. As <br />we looked at our most recent financial forecasts, it became evident that EWEB was facing cost increases that, <br />without budget reductions, would result in a 2013 electric rate increase of up to 20 percent, as well as a <br />double-digit water rate increase. This would follow electric rate increases in the previous two years totaling <br />about 14 percent. Immediate action was needed to stabilize costs and lessen the impact of future rate <br />increases. <br />Like other public agencies, the combination of growing personnel costs and less revenue is part of the bleak <br />financial picture. However, for the utility, the primary drivers for cost increases are: <br />A 15 to18 percent increase in wholesale power costs from the Bonneville Power Administration <br />(BPA), where EWEB gets about 60 percent of its electricity. See attachedfor more information from <br />BPA on this increase. <br />Costs associated with relicensing EWEB’s largest hydroelectric facility, Carmen-Smith. <br />Reducedreimbursement funds from BPA for EWEB conservation activities. <br />Pre-recession long-term power costs for renewable energy. <br />Lower revenues generated from the sale of surplus power. <br />Affordability is a long-held core value for EWEB. But with the lingering effects of a poor economy and <br />mounting rate pressure, our customers have begun to question the utility’s commitment to financial <br />stewardship. In response, EWEB is making hard choices to focus resources on essential services that provide <br />highest value to customers. In all, EWEB is reducing its 2012 budget by between $2 -$3 million, and its <br />2013 budget by approximately $10 million. <br />Because we cannot influence power costs, meeting our budget re-alignment goals required decisions with <br />direct impacts to our employees and community partners. EWEB has offered early departure incentives to <br />employees to reduce the need for layoffs and offer opportunities for impacted staff to move into newly vacant <br />positions. Shrinking the organizational footprint not only means workforce reductions, it implicates a number <br />of programs valued by EWEB and held in high esteem in our community. These hard choices are being <br />approached from a recalibration perspective rather than ‘slash and burn’, but the reality is that there will be <br />ripple effects in the community. Our goal is to look for new ways of delivering key services in a way that <br />captures savings and efficiencies and minimizes the side-effects of our budget stabilization efforts. <br />1 <br />