Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />(The reason for allowing two exempt signs on residential properties and only one on properties <br />used for commercial, industrial or other purposes is that a range of signs are already available by <br />permit in commercial and industrial zones. The “exemption” means those signs are exempt <br />primarily from the permit and fee requirements. The size of the exempt signs –12 square feet– in <br />the proposed ordinance is the same as the current Sign Code’s exemption for “signs during <br />elections.”) <br /> <br />2. Make some minor wording changes to some of the other exemptions to make it clear that they <br />are not based on the sign’s content. <br /> <br />3. Require the City to act on a sign permit application within three weeks of receipt of a complete <br />application. <br /> <br />Planning Commission. Because the Sign Code is in Chapter 9, consideration of the amendments follows <br />Land Use Code amendment procedures. The City Council initiated the code amendment process at its <br />May 29 meeting. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and deliberated on the proposed <br />amendments on June 19 and recommended three changes to the proposed ordinance. The recommended <br />changes are: (1) retain the exemption for “contractor signs” that is in the current code; (2) retain the <br />exemption for “flags” that is in the current code; and (3) limit the size of the two exempt signs on <br />residential properties to six-square-feet (as opposed to 12-square-feet in the proposed ordinance). <br /> <br />not <br />The City Manager recommends that the council adopt the Planning Commission’s recommendations <br />#1 and #2, because retaining those two exemptions would effectively negate the compromise with the <br />ACLU, which has argued that both exemptions are content-based and unconstitutional. As to <br />recommendation #3: Although the allowable size of the signs is also part of the compromise with the <br />ACLU, there is no clear constitutional standard for size limitations. The maximum size of a sign is a <br />policy question for the council – subject to a constitutional principle that the Sign Code allow signs to be <br />large enough to communicate a message. <br /> <br />The council’s public hearing is scheduled for July 23, 2012. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />The City’s Sign Code is in EC 9.6600 to 9.6680. EC 9.6600 describes the purposes of the Sign Code; <br />EC 9.6610 contains the exemptions that are the primary subject of the proposed amendments. <br /> <br />The Sign Code is part of the City’s Land Use Code; the proposed amendments are “Type V” <br />amendments, so the procedures and criteria for legislative amendments. <br /> <br />The applicable criteria are found in EC 9.8065: <br />Code Amendment Approval Criteria. <br /> If the City Council elects to act, it may, by ordinance, adopt an <br />amendment to this land use code that: <br /> <br />(1)Is consistent with applicable statewide planning goals as adopted by the Land Conservation and <br />Development Commission. <br /> <br />(2)Is consistent with applicable provisions of the Metro Plan and applicable adopted refinement <br />plans. <br /> S:\CMO\2012 Council Agendas\M120711\S120711C.doc <br /> <br />