Laserfiche WebLink
council must find that approval of the vacation was in the public interest. Findings of compliance with <br />the approval criteria were included in the council meeting packet as Attachment D. <br />Mayor Piercy asked councilors to declare any ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest. She reported she <br />had briefly discussed the alley vacation with representatives of Capstone Collegiate Communities. <br />Councilor Ortiz declared a potential conflict of interest because of her employment with PeaceHealth. <br />City Attorney Emily Jerome determined that at most Ms. Ortiz's conflict was a potential conflict. <br />Councilor Poling had met with representatives of the applicant, Capstone Collegiate Communities, and <br />heard a brief overview of the project, which included information about the vacation already in the record. <br />Councilor Zelenka had a similar meeting with representatives of the applicant, which included discussion <br />of the Multi -Unit Property Tax Exemption ( MUPTE), on -site management, the proposed project, and a <br />description of the alley vacation. Councilor Farr also had a similar meeting with the applicant although <br />he was unsure the alley vacation was discussed. <br />City Attorney Jerome indicated that the declared conflicts also applied to the next agenda item regarding <br />the MUPTE. She indicated that in addition to the approval criterion, the council must find that proper <br />consent and notice had been provided. <br />Mayor Piercy reviewed the applicable criterion. She noted that the council received a request to leave the <br />record open and would do so. <br />Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing. She first called on those in support of the application and <br />limited remarks to two minutes. <br />John Acken, Capstone Collegiate Communities, commended the community input his company had <br />received and the quality of City's staff work. He concurred with the staff recommendation to straighten <br />the alley, to designate bicycle and pedestrian ways on the alleyway, and to improve the pedestrian and <br />bicycle crossings along adjacent rights -of -way. He said the alley vacation would improve access to <br />downtown and the UO. <br />Gregory McAleer, Ward 3, supported the proposed development as a way to expand downtown and <br />integrate the downtown and university areas. The alley vacation would help provide a bicycle path to <br />campus and promote a healthier lifestyle. He also supported the MUPTE application and urged the <br />council to place more emphasis on student housing downtown. <br />Eric Gunderson, Ward 3, shared Pivot Architecture's support for both the alley vacation and MUPTE <br />applications. He spoke of the many new developments downtown and said both new and existing <br />businesses needed people in the form of residents living downtown. He believed the proposed project <br />was perfectly timed. He also believed the City had planned for this outcome and had constructed <br />infrastructure to support it. He suggested the development would more fully integrate the UO into the <br />community. He asked the council to support both applications. <br />Mark Davis, Veneta, supported the application and thought improved bicycle access on 12 Avenue <br />needed to allow cyclists to avoid car and bus traffic. He said that those who worked at his downtown <br />firm, "CoChops," were bicycling commuters and would be served by the infrastructure constructed to <br />serve the development. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council April 23, 2012 Page 4 <br />Regular Meeting <br />