Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Torrey, commenting by speakerphone, echoed Councilor Kelly. He said he had talked to many <br />people who had shared similar concerns regarding the amount of money to be spent on a ~quick decision." <br />He disagreed that the decision had been made quickly. The MWMC had been involved in the formation of <br />this plan for a long time. He underscored that the citizen participant on the MWMC was a well-respected <br />engineer and that he was unequivocal in his support of the plan. He recognized that people in the business <br />community did not want to spend money frivolously, but they also wanted to ensure that the infra-structure <br />needed for future development was available. He stressed that half of the cost increase was due to cost-of- <br />living increases. Mayor Torrey urged the council not to hold back simply because it did not have a complete <br />understanding of it, adding that, should a project not pan out to be what the community needed, the council <br />could certainly determine that over the 20-year course of the long-term plan. He remained convinced the <br />improvements were needed, however. <br /> <br />Regarding the ;;Coburg question," Mayor Torrey opined that a joint project should be considered whether <br />the City Council approved the plan or not. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman concurred with the comments of councilors Poling and Kelly and Mayor Torrey. She <br />said the large portion of the plan sought to accommodate new growth. She alleged that SDCs were set <br />artificially low and that ratepayers subsidized new growth. She stated that she would support the motion, <br />though she felt this distribution of rate burden to be unfair. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman expressed concern that the addition of the community of Coburg into the wastewater <br />treatment system would cost the City of Eugene ratepayers more. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap~ commented that the concerns in Coburg regarding wastewater were not new. <br /> <br />Councilor Pap~ referred to page 155 of the agenda item summary and asserted that the overflows did not <br />exceed the limit set forth by the federal government. Peter Ruffler, Director of the Wastewater Division of <br />the Public Works Department, predicted the overflows would increase. He said, looking at the historical <br />record, there had been several continuous years of low rainfall, but prior to that there had been several <br />instances of overflow due to storm events. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruffler stated that a comprehensive evaluation of wet weather flow management plans that had looked <br />at various options to handle peak flow issues had been conducted and the results were reflected in the <br />MWMC facilities plan and project list. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling related that, though Coburg had no SDCs in place for water, there had not been a reason to <br />have such a charge thus far. He indicated that Coburg City Manager Mike Hudson had emphasized the <br />community's willingness to ~pay its way." <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner stated that the council had the material and had studied it, but the public did not have <br />such a reference. He asked staff to state for the public the amount of the rate increase. MWMC staff <br />member Susie Smith responded that the increase was projected over the course of five years to be between <br />$5.60 and $6.50 per month. Councilor Meisner reiterated that the MWMC had not done a ~good enough" <br />job of making the public aware of this. <br /> <br />Gary Caldwell, staff member for MWMC, explained that the first four years of increases would get the rate <br />revenue to the debt service support level. Increases beyond that point would be for inflation and operational <br />increases. Councilor Meisner asked if there would be a decrease after six years. Mr. Caldwell replied that <br />nothing in his projections indicated there would be a decrease in the rates. <br /> <br /> <br />