My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMinutes - 06/28/04 Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2004
>
CCMinutes - 06/28/04 Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:29:05 AM
Creation date
8/25/2004 11:17:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilor Nathanson asked staff to estimate what other organizations would have come before the council <br />with last-minute appeals if they had thought they could have been allocated more funding. She also <br />wondered to what degree the other jurisdictions contributed to CCATV. City Manager Taylor responded <br />that the City of Eugene was the only entity that funded CCATV. He predicted that last-minute changes <br />occurring after all of the rest of the processes that went into the budget had transpired could create a pattern <br />among entities that sought funding from the City. He underscored the challenges burgeoning health care <br />costs alone presented to the City and stressed that the City had been forced to take a stance of austerity. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson commented that the City Council used to have two different kinds of contingency <br />funds. She thought it important to differentiate between contingency for discretionary services and <br />unanticipated contingencies. She stated that the former had been effectively eliminated. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman suggested that the council should prioritize the contingency funds at the end of the year. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman agreed that amending the budget could bring in other last-minute requests, but said she <br />would support the amendment. She said the CCTV station provided a venue for free speech, noting that, <br />among others, the station had provided coverage of Police Commission forums. She urged the people <br />working in the CCATV to put together a business plan and a financing plan to bring before the Budget <br />Committee earlier in the budget planning process. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly pointed out that there were significant donations of equipment that satisfied the requirement <br />for matching funds. He recalled that Lane County had provided funding prior to FY04. He commented <br />that, when cable was created, there were to be three cornerstones: public access, education, and government <br />television. He said the City was neglecting public access. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly expressed dismay that the City Manager would call into question items brought before the <br />council at this stage. He emphasized that it was a public hearing and, as such, should hold weight. City <br />Manager Taylor responded that his concern was primarily that there were many opportunities to weigh in on <br />the budget process. He was particularly concerned that two people could make some compelling testimony <br />and "walk away with $10,000." He felt it was precedent-setting. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor commented that when the funding was dropped, it had been dropped at the last minute <br />with no notification that it would even be discussed. She felt that CCATV made great contributions to the <br />community and provided learning opportunities for young people. She said this amendment should be <br />supported because it supported free speech. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey stated, by speakerphone, that he intended to vote in opposition should there be a tie. He said <br />the organization had the capacity through television to ask for funds from the people who use the service. <br />He thought this was a benefit that other programs seeking funding did not have. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the amendment failed, 5:3, councilors Bettman, Kelly, and <br /> Taylor voting in favor. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly shared his appreciation for the restoration of some of the programs funded by Storm Water <br />Funds. He said the restoration did not go as far as it should, however, and the remaining cuts did not reflect <br />the values of the community. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the main motion passed, 8:0. <br /> <br />Council President Bettman called for a five-minute break. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.