Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Eugene Downtown Public Safety Zone Data January 2012 through August 15, 2012 <br /> <br />Information about Disposition <br />Total number of notices issued: 48 <br />Number of notices withdrawn or never filed by EPD: 5 <br />Number of notices dismissed: 15 <br />Number of 90-day exclusions imposed: 22 <br />Number of one-year exclusions imposed: 6 <br /> <br />Information about Hearings and Advocacy <br />Number of hearings requested: 9 <br />Number of those who request a hearing who appear for hearing: 7 <br />Number of requests to meet advocate: 1 <br /> <br />Information about People Receiving Notices <br />Number of people issued notices to appear: 42 <br />Number who report no address: 25 <br />Race (self-reported or officer-identified) - Caucasian: 37 <br />Average number of police contacts per person: 63 <br />Number who have violated DPSZ order: 11 <br /> <br />During this period, there were 15 dismissals. Additionally, there were five notices that were withdrawn <br />or never filed at the request of the Police Department because, upon review, the cases were deemed <br />inconsistent with the new guidelines released by Operations Command (Attachment A). Of the notices <br />dismissed, five were dismissed due to judicial discretion, four were dismissed because the underlying <br />charge was not eligible for the noticed exclusion, two were dismissed because the defendant was <br />sentenced to prison and four were dismissed because the appropriate paperwork was not received in a <br />timely manner by the Municipal Court. <br /> <br />One of the significant concerns raised in February involved the perception that there is insufficient due <br />process for people receiving a 90-day exclusion. Currently, upon receiving a “notice to show cause” <br />which explains the potential of being excluded from the Downtown Public Safety Zone, a person is <br />given court appearance date and time within three to five business days. This serves as their first <br />opportunity for due process. However, only 13 percent of the people cited take advantage of this <br />opportunity by requesting a hearing and appearing at the hearing. The others either do not request a <br />hearing, or fail to appear for the hearing that has been requested. This frequently results in the exclusion <br />being upheld by the judge after review of the reports. The result is that many individuals are excluded <br />without taking advantage of the first opportunity for due process. Another criticism of the 90-day <br />exclusion is that it is issued as the result of an underlying charge, which is not adjudicated when the 90- <br />day exclusion is imposed. <br /> <br />A second concern raised by the City Council is the low use of the advocacy program, established to help <br />defendants who have received a notice to appear. Providing court-appointed attorneys for eligible <br />defendants who receive notices to appear would be expected to increase the advocacy provided to <br />defendants. The Eugene Police Department (EPD) issues approximately 15,000 citations annually. <br />Providing court-appointed attorneys to the estimated 100 recipients of exclusion notices who would be <br />eligible and request an attorney would cost approximately $15,000 per year. This would increase the <br />perception of due process. <br />