Laserfiche WebLink
City of Eugene City Council <br />Page 12 <br />September 12, 2012 <br /> <br />improve a needed community service while also accomplishing community goals around attracting new <br />riders to transit. <br />exceeds that of many much larger communities. In fact, <br />based on 2010 National Transit Database figures, our productivity and ridership exceed that of most <br />th <br />regions. In productivity (boardings per vehicle hour) LTD was ranked 29 out of the over 500 transit <br />st <br />services, and for absolute ridership, LTD had 11.4 million boardings in 2010 and was ranked 71 overall. <br />This compares favorably with other even much larger transit districts including Phoenix, Memphis, <br />Snohomish, Jacksonville, and Riverside. <br />A comparison of the number of people and jobs along the Franklin and Gateway EmX routes, with that of <br />ththth <br />the West Eugene EmX 6/7/11 corridor indicates that while the Franklin line has higher employment <br />with downtown and the University, the existing and projected population and employment for the West <br />Eugene corridor is similar or higher for than that of the successful Gateway corridor, and higher in existing <br />and projected population compared to the Franklin line. While the Franklin and Gateway are successful <br />now, both will be further complimented by this extension of the system that provides a greater overall <br />level of service and connectivity that enhances our community. The total benefits of EmX corridors and <br />the EmX system will best be seen over time as more of the system is built out. <br />All transportation modes are subsidized at some level and the ability of transit users to fully fund <br />operations was last seen in the United State in the late 1960's and early 1970's. During the transition to <br />government funded transit services, the mandate was to ensure that people in our communities had a <br />cost effective way to access jobs, education, recreation, medical services, etc. A number of federal <br />guidelines, along with state and federal legislation govern the setting of transit fares. Title VI of the Civil <br />Rights Act outlines specific analyses that require transit districts to show that fare pricing does not <br />discriminate based on a person's national origin. Similarly, Executive Order 12898 outlines restrictions <br />that apply to minority and low income populations. Senior citizens and people with disabilities are <br />required to only pay one-half the full adult rate. Paratransit rates cannot exceed two times the adult cash <br />fare. This illustrates that transit districts must work within the many laws and requirements while <br />developing fare structures that provide the greatest opportunity to increase revenues generated from the <br />fare box. While the social service aspects of public transportation continue to be fundamental part of <br />what transit agencies provide, today's opportunities for providing viable alternatives to single occupancy <br />car travel offer economic, social, and environmental benefits. The development of EmX service provides a <br />regional network of routes that provide a level of choice that accommodates the governmental mandate <br />to provide access while at the same providing an enhanced level of service that many residents will choose <br />to ride over driving their car. <br />Finally, as described in Chapter 5 of the EA, its important to remember that <br />improvements to transit service would be provided at a lower cost per rider to LTD, and that <br />range financial plan does not envision any further reductions in service hours, while in the long term LTD <br />anticipates the ability to expand service hours. <br /> <br /> <br />