Laserfiche WebLink
City of Eugene City Council <br />Page 2 <br />September 12, 2012 <br /> <br />ZĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ: <br />ny further reductions in service hours and in the long <br />term it anticipates the ability to expand service hours. <br />LTD is funded through a payroll tax and this tax is sensitive to swings in the local economy. In the late <br />1970's LTD and the community faced the areas deepest recession. Over 30 percent of LTD's service was <br />cut. Recessions in 2001 and the most recent recession have led to reductions in operating revenues and <br />subsequent cuts in materials and services, personnel, and in bus service. The District's Board of Directors <br />is evaluating maintaining larger reserves in order to bridge these downtowns in the future. LTD allocates <br />funding each year to address running time issues that result from increased ridership and additional traffic <br />on our roads. The addition of these funds is a priority and the Board of Directors is committed to funding <br />these additional hours of service. Overall system performance, based on indicators such as on-time <br />performance and ridership, remains high. As our economy continues to improve, LTD will have additional <br />funds to invest in the system. How these funds are prioritized will involve feedback from current riders <br />and from residents who live in areas not currently served. <br />osts are underestimated in the EA, the REMI analysis <br />submitted by OMOT incorrectly assumes that the 2031 bus miles in Table 2.2 of the EA are what LTD <br />would operate in 2017. The bus miles in table 2.2 of the EA reflect an operating scenario for the 2031 <br />Regional Transportation Plan which includes increases to regular bus service throughout the system that <br />would be operated by 2031. This operating scenario is financially feasible in 2031 based on the current <br />analysis. However, it is not feasible and should not be used to develop operating costs for 2017. At this <br />point in time, LTD is planning to maintain regular bus service hours in 2017, and to consider service <br />expansion based on available resources. <br />Additionally, the REMI estimate uses cost factors from the Fully Allocated Cost Model (FACM) to <br />estimate the cost of the increment of service that would be added with EmX starting in 2017. The FACM <br />factors are not the appropriate factors to use in estimating the cost of an increment of service. Because of <br />economies of scale, the increment of service LTD would add with the WEEE project can be provided for <br />much less cost. The FACM factors are too high. Rather, a more direct-cost approach should be taken to <br />identify the incremental costs of actual changes that would occur in implementation of the additional <br />service. That is the approach used to estimate operational costs in the EA. If the annual operating cost <br />was $4M LTD would share their concern, however it clearly will not for the reasons noted above. <br />Regarding the potential cost and supply impacts of peak oil, <br /> activities this region can use in preparing for peak oil and GHG emissions reduction. This is due <br />to its ability to use existing technologies to provide a more cost effective operation combined with its <br />significant success in attracting new riders. As events unfold around the peak oil and GHG issues, BRT <br />gives this region the nimbleness to readily adapt as more sustainable technologies are developed. <br /> <br />