Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In addition, two criminal conduct allegations were dismissed both for timeliness. In one case, the <br />complaint was dismissed after an initial investigation revealed that the crime alleged was a <br />misdemeanor for which the statute of limitations had long since expired. In the other, a reporting party <br />reiterated a complaint, initially reported in 2007; that she was assaulted during an arrest in the early <br />1990s. The complaint was investigated by EPD in 2007, and no evidence was found to support the <br />allegation. When we received the reiterated complaint in 2011, we forwarded it to the Oregon State <br />Police for investigation. The OSP criminal investigation wa <br />They determined that there was insufficient evidence to prove that the officer did anything other than a <br />permissible search; in addition, the statute of limitations had expired. Following the criminal <br />investigat <br /> <br /> Misconduct <br />I <br />use of force, conduct, or performance. Allegations of misconduct <br />investigations. The 62 complaints included 134 total allegations of misconduct by EPD employees. <br /> <br />19 of the 62 complaints were sustained, about 30.6% of the complaints. In addition, two complaints <br />were still pending at the time of this writing, and three complaints were administratively closed <br />(because the involved employee no longer was employed by EPD). <br /> <br />2011 Allegation Cases by Classification* <br />Criminal Conduct Misconduct <br />25 <br />22 <br />20 <br />15 15 <br />15 <br />8 <br />10 <br />6 <br />5 <br />1 1 1 1 <br />0 <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />