My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Ambulance Fund Stabilization
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2012
>
CC Agenda - 10/10/12 - Work Session
>
Item B: Ambulance Fund Stabilization
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2012 1:34:47 PM
Creation date
10/5/2012 1:20:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/10/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 1 <br />contributing to the problem. One is the growing percent of population eligible for Medicare. The other is <br />the economy. Regional providers do not refuse transport because of inability to pay and are being forced <br />to write-off more and more bills as uncollectible and the percent of under- and uninsured increases. <br />TASK FORCE PARTICIPANTS <br />In October of 2011, the Task Force began meeting on a bi-weekly basis. The Task Force consists of the <br />following elected officials: <br />Eugene City Councilor Andrea Ortiz <br />Eugene City Councilor Mike Clark <br />Springfield City Councilor Sean VanGordon <br />Springfield City Councilor Marilee Woodrow <br />Lane County Commissioner Jay Bozievich <br />Lane Rural Board Vice President Pete Holmes <br />Lane Rural Board Member Jim Drew <br />****** <br />The attached report from the Task Force provides additional background and a series of options, which <br />are: <br />Do nothing. <br />1. Jurisdictions would remain responsible for providing and funding ambulance <br />transport within its assigned Ambulance Service Areas (ASA). Under this option, jurisdictions <br />recognize stabilizing the fund could require additional fee increases, continued reduction in <br />expenditures, change in service levels, and/or on-going General Fund support for the continued <br />high-quality provision of this core service. The elected bodies could choose to make General <br />Fund support the permanent solution to the problem. However, the Task Force believes that, for <br />the sake of preserving other local government services to the greatest extent possible, General <br />Fund support should be viewed only as a short-term solution. <br />Privatize. <br />2. The Cities of Eugene and Springfield currently contract with a private provider for <br />non-emergency transport. Under this contract, the Cities remain responsible for the service <br />provided within the ASA. Under full privatization, the public would not only relinquish quality <br />control, but also the emergency response versatility afforded by the firefighter/paramedics now <br />staffing local ambulances. The goal would be to find the equilibrium point between these two <br />ends of the public/private partnership spectrum. <br />Form Ambulance Transport District. <br />3. A new limited special-purpose district could be formed <br />in the region, or the region could annex to an existing health district, to provide ambulance <br />service. Alternatively, a county service district could be established. In planning for formation <br />of, or annexation to, a special district, many further, more specific decisions will be needed <br />including boundary issues, revenue requirements, and the possibility of tax rate compression. An <br />election will be required. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.