My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Ambulance Fund Stabilization
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2012
>
CC Agenda - 10/10/12 - Work Session
>
Item B: Ambulance Fund Stabilization
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2012 1:34:47 PM
Creation date
10/5/2012 1:20:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/10/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 1 <br />County Fire Defense Board. The ATTF also reviewed a high-level presentation on <br />projected costs and estimated rate for the regional service. <br />In planning for formation of, or annexation to, a special district, a feasibility study <br />highlighting proposed district legal boundaries, changes to the Metro Plan, sustainable <br />tax revenue requirement, and taxing issues such as uncollectible percent and <br />compression, both a reduction to gross tax revenue would need to be completed. Because <br />implementation of district options will take a considerable period of time, we recommend <br />the immediate formation of an intergovernmental staff team to fast track the study of the <br />feasibility of implementing this solution. <br />BACKGROUND <br />Throughout our region, the majority of patients transported are covered by Medicare. Before the <br />implementation of the Ambulance Fee Schedule on April 1, 2002, ambulance suppliers received <br />payment from Medicare on a “Reasonable Charge Basis.” Medicare would pay 80 percent of the <br />allowable amount and the remaining balance was the responsibility of the patient. This allowed <br />transport providers broad flexibility in setting rates and assured recovery of costs. <br />The Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 added a new section 1834(1) to the Social Security <br />Act, which mandated the implementation of a national fee schedule. This section also required <br />ambulance providers and suppliers to accept the Medicare allowed charge, which includes the <br />patient’s co-payment, as payment in full and transport agencies were no longer able to bill the <br />patient or another insurance provider for the balance of the reasonable charge. <br />The new fee schedule took effect in 2002 and was phased in over a five-year period, with full <br />implementation on January 1, 2006. Year one (4/1/02-12/31/02) provided a blending of 20 <br />percent fee schedule and 80 percent reasonable charge. The reasonable charge portion was then <br />reduced by 20 percent in each of the four subsequent years, so that as of 2006 only the fee <br />schedule amount was payable. Since 2006, jurisdictions have received small, incremental <br />increases in reimbursement. However, current reimbursement levels remain well below the cost <br />of the service. <br />Put simply, the national fee schedule, which covers 60 to 70 percent of all transports, does not <br />allow ambulance providers to recover the cost of providing the service. Instead, where we once <br />had the ability to collect the full reasonable charge (which has risen over the years from $535 to <br />$1,600 per transport), we are now reimbursed between $200 and $400, depending on the type of <br />call. Medicaid, the state of Oregon’s health insurance program, reimburses similarly. <br />While Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement reductions are the primary reason that emergency <br />medical transport in our region has become a revenue-negative enterprise, two national trends are <br />also contributing to the problem. One is the growing number of individuals eligible for Medicare. <br />The other is the economy. Ambulance transport providers in our region do not refuse transport <br />because of inability to pay and are being forced to write off more and more bills as uncollectible. <br /> May 24, 2012 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.