My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 5065
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2012 No. 5050-5075
>
Resolution No. 5065
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2012 7:57:52 AM
Creation date
10/30/2012 7:57:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
10/24/2012
Document_Number
5065
CMO_Effective_Date
10/24/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5065 <br />A RESOLUTION TO OPPOSE THE TRANSPORT OF COAL FOR <br />EXPORT THROUGH EUGENE. <br />The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that: <br />A. In October 2011, the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay (the "Port") signed an <br />exclusive negotiating agreement with an anonymous company interested in shipping coal from <br />the Port. The proposal, called Project Mainstay, would build a new terminal and ship 6 -10 <br />million tons of coal per year. <br />B. This coal would originate in Wyoming and Montana and would be shipped to Asia. <br />The Port of Coos Bay indicated that as many as 10 trains with 120 to 135 cars that are 1.5 miles <br />long could pass through Eugene per week. At 10 to 15 mile per hour these trains could block <br />intersections in Eugene for 5 minutes. This would increase traffic and the risk of delaying <br />emergency vehicles at rail crossings. <br />C. According to findings from the Environmental Protection Agency and research in <br />other communities; there are likely to be significant negative impacts to Eugene's public health, <br />economy, and air and water quality. <br />D. These mile and half long trains which typically carrying 100 tons of coal; can lose up <br />to 3% of their load in transit in coal dust. The train cars are not likely to be covered due to danger <br />of fires, and nor are they likely to be sealed with a surfactant to prevent the coal dust loss en <br />route because of the additional cost of applying the surfactant. <br />E. This coal dust will have a negative impact on local businesses, farms, homes and <br />crops. Property values along coal transport routes have also been shown to decline. As well, <br />local food production is likely to sustain adverse impacts which are counter to our community's <br />desire to increase local healthy food production. <br />F. Coal dust contains toxic heavy metals, including mercury, arsenic, and lead; all <br />known to have serious adverse health impacts on people of all ages, particularly children. These <br />heavy metals, as well as emissions from the diesel - powered engines, are linked to increases in <br />cancer, bronchitis, emphysema, black lung disease and birth defects. The train tracks through <br />Eugene go directly through neighborhoods with populations that already face adverse health <br />impacts. <br />G. Mercury and other toxic air pollutants produced from burning the coal in Asian <br />nations have been shown to adversely impact the Northwest's air, water, fish, and wildlife. <br />H. Exporting to, and burning coal in, Asia for electricity production will increase <br />greenhouse gases (GHG) and hasten the adverse effects of global warming. Exporting coal to <br />Resolution - Page 1 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.