Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Pap~ pointed out that the total cost of the capital improvements was listed at $160 million on <br />page 113 of the packet. He asked why there was a discrepancy from the original number presented before <br />the council. Dave Jewett, legal counsel for the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission, <br />responded that the cost for the improvements had not increased. He explained that Oregon Administrative <br />Rules (OAR) required the cost estimate to encompass all possible work. Because of this, the estimate <br />involved additional work that would not be completed unless the Department of Environmental Quality <br />(DEQ) required it. He said efforts were being made to convince the DEQ that the additional work was <br />unnecessary. <br /> <br /> Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Poling, moved that the Council adopt Council <br /> Bill 4876, amending the Metro Plan text. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman voiced her support for both motions, though not unconditionally. She believed the <br />financing proposal to be better than what was in place, but felt some of the cost should be borne by SDCs. <br />She reiterated her feelings that SDCs were "artificially low" to the ratepayers. <br /> <br />Councilor Meisner conveyed his reluctant support for the motions. He recapped his previously stated <br />concerns regarding MWMC, its contemplated 20-year plan, the cost of the plan, its specific choices, and, <br />most of all, the lack of public knowledge about the process and the consequences of the process. He <br />predicted "it" would "come back to bite us." <br /> <br />Councilor Pap6 echoed Councilor Meisner's concerns, particularly the lack of public process. He agreed <br />that the statutory process had been followed, but felt the lack of information on the cost of the 20-year <br />project list did not allow the public to consider what the MWMC was setting forth in an educated way. <br />He asked if approval of the two ordinances would prejudice taking on a parmership with the City of <br />Coburg. <br /> <br /> Mr. Yeiter stated that the ordinances would not change the existing policy. City Attorney Glenn Klein <br /> agreed, adding that at this stage the result of a "yea" or "nay" vote would have an identical effect on the <br /> possibility of parmering with Coburg. <br /> <br /> Councilor Pap6 wanted to state for the record that the legislative intent was that, should efficiencies be <br /> found through partnership, the City of Eugene would be willing to parmer with Coburg on a wastewater <br /> facility. <br /> <br /> Mayor Torrey voiced his respect for what Councilor Meisner and Councilor Pap~ said regarding reaching <br /> out to the public. He said the frustration, however, lay in the fact that this was not a "sexy item" for the <br /> public. He remarked that as often as the MWMC tried to reach out and invite the public to speak to this, <br /> they had not been able to raise much interest in its long-term planning. He complimented the staff of the <br /> MWMC and the three jurisdictions who weighed in on the matter in their recent efforts to reach out to <br /> Coburg. <br /> <br /> Councilor Meisner clarified that he was not concerned with the number of people who testified on the <br /> item. He felt the communication to the public did not state in a clear fashion that the public hearings were <br /> about a double-digit percentage increase in wastewater rates. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 26, 2004 Page 7 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />