Laserfiche WebLink
0600). (Metropolitan Affordable Housing Corporation--Apple Orchard Devel- <br /> opment) <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked if the units envisioned to be built would always be low-income units. Mr. <br />Weinman responded that in these cases, they would be low-income for at least 40 years, twice the time of <br />the tax exemption because of the fact they were partially federally funded. If they ceased to be low- <br />income, they would lose the exemption. <br /> <br />Referring to the City's Housing Dispersal Policy, Councilor Bettman asked if staff considered each <br />development or the entire area in question before it reached a determination of the percentage of low- <br />income housing in an area. Mr. Weinman clarified that the policy was related to each development being <br />considered. It regarded only the number of units in the specific development. Councilor Bettman asked if <br />the Housing Policy Board (HPB) had considered revising the policy to take into account the fact that <br />certain neighborhoods had more low-income housing than other neighborhoods. Mr. Weinman said the <br />policy had been amended several times, and the HPB planned to review it again this fall. The policy took <br />into consideration the number of low-income units in the census tract. Councilor Bettman suggested the <br />HPB consider whether any particular area was underserved with such housing, given the need. <br /> <br />Councilors Kelly and Poling determined from Mr. Weinman that the applicant representing Public Private <br />Partnerships requested that the council not consider the application tonight because of his desire to revise <br />the project and application and resubmit it to the HPB. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor asked what happened when residents ceased to be low-income; did they get to continue <br />living in low-income housing? Mr. Weinman said in this case, yes. However, the vast majority of <br />residents continue to be low-income. People tended to move once they could afford to, but were not <br />kicked out immediately. <br /> <br /> Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br /> Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Poling, moved to approve Resolution 4804 <br /> approving a low-income rental housing property tax exemption for a portion of the prop- <br /> erty located at 150 Santa Clara Avenue (Tax Lot 17-04-11-43-00800). (St. Vincent de <br /> Paul Society of Lane County). Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for a five-minute break. <br /> <br />5. ACTION: <br /> Request for Funding for Commercial/Industrial Lands Study <br /> <br /> Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Poling, moved to direct he City Manager to <br /> provide $15,000 in contingency funds for the commercial/industrial lands study as rec- <br /> ommended on page 8 of the report of the Mayor's Committee on Economic Devdopment. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for council comments and questions. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman indicated her likely intent to move to table the motion to a time certain to allow for <br />more council discussion about the scope of work and for the inclusion of the roundtable's recommenda- <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council August 9, 2004 Page 9 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />