My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Admin Order 58-12-14
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Administrative Orders
>
2012
>
Admin Order 58-12-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2012 2:23:00 PM
Creation date
11/7/2012 2:09:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Admin Orders
Document_Date
11/2/2012
Document_Number
58-12-14
Author
CRO
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
463
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comments on the River Road / Santa Clara Stormwater Basin Master Plan <br />from the Santa Clara Community Organization. <br />Therese Walch <br />Eugene Public Works <br />99 E. Broadway, Suite 400 <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />October 23, 2009 <br />This basin master plan for River Rd/Santa Clara is an opportunity to use all the "tools" in the <br />toolbox to best protect the open waterways, maximize storm water conveyance through these channels, and <br />accommodate future densification without sacrificing what makes the RR/SC neighborhoods unique. <br />While this plan touts some new ideas in the use of rain- gardens both along streets and in neighborhoods, it <br />misses the mark in recognizing the existing natural infrastructure and prioritizing its protection and <br />enhancement. The cost of manufactured infrastructure that degrades over time versus the protection of <br />existing natural infrastructure that improves over time is not something we can afford, and is not the wisest <br />use of what we have. This plan falls short of its aspirations to "provide a management strategy for storm <br />water that reflects the uniqueness of the RR/SC basin ". Our hydrology is not what makes us unique. <br />The forms and patterns created by heritage trees, waterways, prime soils, agricultural operations, significant <br />populations of both urban and rural and county and city residents and all they bring to their neighborhood is <br />what makes us unique. Without taking into account these factors, this plan has no chance to meet its goal <br />of planning reflecting that uniqueness. <br />The major difference between this basin and others throughout the city is our lack of storm water <br />infrastructure and our extensive network of open waterways. These waterways, both large and small, are <br />the infrastructure that makes development possible. They are also our primary defense from flooding. <br />To date, many of the "lesser" waterways in our area have not been mapped and merit no level of protection <br />from filling by development. These swales and watercourses, not wet much of the time, are what protect <br />the existing older development from high water events. As larger lots on these swales are divided and <br />infrll development happens, the swales are not identified as part of a complete stormwater system and are <br />instead deemed "depressions" in otherwise developable land and filled. There is no recourse for the <br />existing residents along what was a continuous watercourse that now ends at their property line. The <br />neighbor's fill has increased their risk of inundation. There is a need for these watercourses to be mapped <br />and protected from filling. Developers in our area view them as impediments to the "clean slate" they like <br />to use when mapping their subdivision. We see them as an opportunity for the developer to design around <br />their own use of them to accommodate the increase in stormwater their development will ultimately bring <br />while maintaining the natural infrastructure that protects all of Santa Clara and River Rd. In this way, <br />there is a direct benefit for the developer to use them and save on manufactured infrastructure costs. <br />To date our basin has a total impervious surface area of approximately 37.5 %, and is projected in this plan <br />to reach 51% at buildout. This will be the highest projected percentage of impervious surface of any of <br />the city's basin areas. This plan highlights how impervious surface area affects both water quality and <br />flood control profoundly. <br />Water quality: Research shows that "water quality degradation occurs at relatively low levels of <br />imperviousness (10 -20 %), so the implications of development on water quality are significant" <br />(p.2 -23). <br />Flood control: The computer model used to predict water levels did not match actual observed levels. <br />Model parameters were adjusted to try and make the model more closely resemble actual conditions. <br />Then several "additional model runs were conducted to evaluate the model's sensitivity to changes in <br />input parameters. The results of these sensitivity analyses indicated that the impervious percentage <br />area was the most sensitive model input parameter. "(p. 3 -6) <br />So, with impervious surface percentage being the most influential variable, this basin projected to have the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.