Laserfiche WebLink
funding constraints), however, extending the piped system wholesale throughout <br />RR -SC is not feasible nor is it the City's plan to do so. As shown on the figure, <br />new development or infill development, if not located on an improved street that <br />drains to a piped system, will need to assess the feasibility of constructing a piped <br />system (including downstream connection and capacity constraints), and if not <br />feasible or desirable, then the developer would need to select an approved <br />alternative for managing stormwater on -site. Modifications to Figure 4 -11 will be <br />made to reflect more clearly that on -site stormwater management (including <br />volume controls) would be necessary under these circumstances. <br />o Future situation, assuming new local "green street" design concepts are <br />incorporated into the City's Local Street Plan (through a separate process). The <br />local green street design concepts, which are envisioned to be alternatives to <br />current local street standards, as proposed, assume that the linear rain gardens are <br />sized for right of way runoff only, therefore development sites adjacent to a green <br />streets would by necessity need to manage stormwater on -site (including volume <br />controls). The green streets concepts could be employed on new local streets, or <br />in a re- development situation. <br />Permeable pavement options need to be considered [RR -81 <br />Most street improvements will occur in response to development and most likely only in areas <br />annexed by the City of Eugene. Permeable pavement has been used by the City on a pilot <br />project basis, and is an accepted stormwater impervious surface reduction technique as long as it <br />meets design criteria, but is not acceptable yet for use in the right of way. It should be <br />acknowledged that such pavements accompany a higher construction cost and may be limited in <br />their functionality without significant maintenance to prevent pore clogging. Permeable <br />pavements are not recommended for sites with a likelihood of high oil and grease concentrations, <br />which would include streets with a high number of average daily trips (> 1,000). <br />Topic; Impervious Surface Area (ISA) <br />RR -SC highest ISA percentages compared to other basins. [SC -31 <br />The amount of impervious surface area (ISA) will increase as vacant or "underdeveloped" <br />(meaning, not yet developed to Metro Plan designation and related densities) properties are <br />developed. The basin plans estimate the future, or "buildout" ISA by assuming properties will <br />be developed in accordance with the Metro Plan designations, and utilizes average ISA <br />percentages by generalized land use categories, and the area of each land use category. The <br />buildout ISA for the RR -SC basin is projected to be 50% (plan page 2 -12), an increase from the <br />2006 ISA of 37.5 %. The increase in ISA can be partly attributed to the relatively significant <br />amount of vacant industrial area (326 acres as of 2006) within the basin. The estimated average <br />RR -SC Stormwater Basin Plan Comments Pg. l l of 17 <br />