My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20499
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2012 No. 20485-20503
>
Ordinance No. 20499
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2012 5:19:17 PM
Creation date
11/28/2012 4:37:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20499
Document_Title
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AMENDED HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE TRACKING INSTRUCTIONS FOR REPORTS DUE BEGINNING APRIL 1, 2013, AND REMOVING THREE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES FROM THE LIST OF REPORTABLE CHEMICALS.
Adopted_Date
11/26/2012
Approved Date
11/27/2012
CMO_Effective_Date
12/28/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. MANUFACTURING vs. MAINTENANCE USES <br />General guidelines: Hazardous substances that are on a site, but whose use is not directly <br />related to manufacturing or related research and development, are not reportable. This area is <br />subject to considerable interpretation, mostly concerning maintenance and operation of <br />equipment. In general, the Toxics Board has drawn a distinction between substances used for <br />cosmetic purposes (not reportable) and those used for necessary maintenance (reportable); and <br />between the maintenance of actual manufacturing equipment (reportable) and equipment with <br />non - manufacturing purposes (not reportable). The Toxics Board has also drawn a distinction <br />between materials used to maintain and operate motorized vehicles (e.g., forklifts) and those <br />used to operate and maintain non - motorized vehicles (e.g., carts). Materials in the former <br />category are not reportable, while those in the latter are. <br />27. QUESTION: A listed toxic chemical is used to clean a process - related tower at a <br />manufacturing facility. Is the use of the chemical exempt from threshold and materials <br />accounting calculations under the routine janitorial and facility grounds maintenance <br />exemption? <br />ANSWER: No. Materials used to maintain process - related equipment at a facility (e.g., <br />cleaners and lubricants) are not exempt. Because the tower is process - related, the <br />exemption does not apply. This exemption only applies to the use of products that are <br />specifically used for routine janitorial, facility grounds maintenance, building <br />maintenance, and office supplies. <br />28. QUESTION: Would lubrication of bearings on product mixing machines (assuming the <br />lubricants had a reportable chemical) be considered part of the manufacturing process and <br />therefore reportable? <br />ANSWER: Yes. <br />29. QUESTION: We paint and sometimes don't paint our equipment. It is not necessary to <br />the functioning or maintenance of the machine, but is more cosmetic in purpose. Would <br />the paint used be reportable or would that come under facility maintenance? <br />ANSWER: Substances not used in the manufacturing process, or to perpetuate the <br />manufacturing process, are not reportable. Therefore paints used for cosmetic purposes, <br />even on manufacturing equipment, are not reportable. <br />30. QUESTION: Would lubricating the wheel bearings on transport racks that carry the <br />finished product to another part of the facility for shipping be reportable? What about <br />lubrication of bearings on racks that do not contain finished product, such as proofing <br />racks? <br />-63- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.