Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Preference for Controlling Investments <br /> July November <br />Survey Survey <br />Allow council to determine spending 24% 17% <br />Dedicate a portion of spending and allow council to control the rest 36% 42% <br />Dedicate 100% to specific expenditures and not allow council to alter the allocation 25% 37% <br />Refused/Don’t Know 15% 4% <br /> <br />A number of arguments were proposed in the November survey to test the impact of additional <br />measure features related to accountability and transparency – restrictions on how the money <br />would be spent, a cap on the fee, an oversight committee, and five-year review clause. Voters were <br />asked if these features would make it more or less likely that they would support the measure. In <br />all cases, these features increased support for the new fee. <br /> <br />November 2012 Survey <br />Test of Arguments – Accountability and Transparency Measures <br /> Much More or No Effect/ Doesn’t Much More or <br />Somewhat More Matter / Unsure / Somewhat More <br />Likely to Support Don’t Know Likely to Oppose <br />Restrictions on how the money is spent 73% 20% 7% <br />Cap on the amount of the fee 69% 21% 10% <br />Oversight committee 58% 29% 13% <br />5-year review clause 58% 28% 14% <br /> <br />In drafting an ordinance for the new City Service Fee, the council should consider which of these <br />features would be included as part of the accountability and transparency for the fee. At the <br />January 14 council work session, the City Manager will present recommendations for <br />accountability and transparency measures to be built into the ordinance for the new City Service <br />Fee. <br /> <br />Limited Income Assistance: Council members have indicated a concern about how the new City <br />Service Fee might affect residents with limited income. The new City Service Fee could include <br />features to mitigate or lessen the impact of the fee on those fee payers. The method for doing so <br />can be simple or complicated, and the impact on the cost of billing and collection will be affected <br />by the method chosen. <br /> <br />If the fee is billed and collected through EWEB, the City could participate in EWEB’s Customer <br />Care program which is targeted at individuals and ratepayers with limited incomes. The way the <br />program currently works is: <br /> <br /> <br />Up to $200 of bill-paying assistance is available per year. <br /> <br /> <br />Ratepayers at 60 percent of Oregon median income are eligible to apply. <br /> <br /> <br />There is similar assistance available for customers who are receiving unemployment <br /> <br />compensation. <br /> <br />There are a number of benefits from incorporating the City Service Fee into this program. First, it <br />is an already existing program that will be relatively simple to add to. Fee payers will have an easy <br /> S:\CMO\2013 Council Agendas\M130114\S130114B.doc <br /> <br />