Laserfiche WebLink
<br />weaknesses. The auditors noted that the City complied with all laws with one exception - the City <br />exceeded its legal budget (page 48) in one fund: <br /> <br />The Parking Services Enterprise Fund overspent its Departmental appropriation by <br /> <br />$115,945, or 3.3 percent. The overexpenditure was due primarily to unanticipated garage <br />security costs due to a delay in the implementation of the new downtown police patrol unit. <br /> <br />The Parking Services Enterprise Fund also exceeded its Capital Outlay appropriations by <br /> <br />$55,844, because of higher than anticipated costs to complete the steam upgrade project. <br /> <br />ORS require that all over-expenditures be brought to the attention of the governing body. Because <br />there is no dollar threshold, it is common for local governments to have occasional over- <br />expenditures. <br /> <br />The auditors conduct the audit of the City's basic financial statements in accordance with <br />generally accepted auditing standards and the Minimum Standards for Audits of Oregon Municipal <br />Corporations. In addition, as a recipient of federal grants, the City is subject to the Federal Single <br />Audit Act of 1984, which requires that the audit be conducted in accordance with Government <br />Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and Office of <br />Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments and Non- <br />Profit Organizations. These standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that the auditors plan and <br />perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the basic financial statements are <br />free of material misstatement and whether the City complied with the laws and regulations <br />pertaining to federally-funded programs. In addition to state and federal requirements, the City <br />has a contractual obligation in connection with its debt issuances which requires that the City <br />issue annual audited financial statements. <br /> <br />Management is responsible for the information contained in, and the preparation of, the City's <br />financial statements. To effectively fulfill this responsibility and to contain the cost of auditor <br />services, City staff devotes significant effort to the closing of accounting records, the preparation <br />of schedules and audit workpapers, and the production of the CAFR. This also results in staff <br />expertise being developed on specific financial and service issues that can then be used to assist <br />departments and other pertinent parties. <br /> <br />Two additional reports, beginning on page 155, specifically address compliance with Federal laws, <br />regulations, contracts and grants, and indicate that the auditors found no material instances of the <br />City's noncompliance with these requirements, nor were there any findings or questioned costs <br />noted in relation to Federal awards made to the City. <br /> <br />Professional requirements mandate auditors provide a report to the governing body that <br />addresses any concerns or findings they encountered in such audit-related issues as significant <br />audit findings, accounting estimates and disagreements with management. Isler CPA’s memo <br />addressing these issues for fiscal year 2012 is attached and it states that there were no concerns <br />that required communication to the council. <br /> <br />The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a <br />Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Eugene for its <br />Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. This was <br /> S:\CMO\2013 Council Agendas\M130114\S1301144C.doc <br />